![]() |
|
#141
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Just want to chime in that I LOVE the new structure for tourneys. I can't understand how 2plus2er's would not like a structure that gives a bigger edge to skilled players. If it wasn't for my crappy acceler8tor bonus. I would never leave party. [/ QUOTE ] Are you serious? the $100 got to the FT in 2.5 hours. This 5r has the average stack w/ 10bb's. You think this is a good strtucture? the chipstacks look cool, but th eblinds going up 10 minutes, and going up FAST. [/ QUOTE ] surry, refering to 1 table sng's. I aggree for MTT's this is probably pretty bad. I have not played any though. So maybe my excitement was too soon. |
|
#142
|
|||
|
|||
|
Concerned about the new MTT Blind structure. I hear SNGs are longer, but MTTs look like they are about one-third as long. I think players want more play for their money, especially in the bigger buy-in tourneys. (even 20 and up!)
|
|
#143
|
|||
|
|||
|
2 hours + 4 crashes = good times
|
|
#144
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
This is the same as me, i wish they would respond to serious complaints in this thread rather than just ignore them, and respond to the ones they no answers to. [/ QUOTE ] Bear in mind that this is just one Party rep. They're probalby passing the technical/bug issues over to tech people, but they won't necessarily get answers back for everything same-day. Other questions go to marketing, or cust service, or VIP, or management. And remember, everyone this rep approaches at Party is already swamped with their own emails/phone calls/requests generated by the software changeover. These kinds of cutovers are NEVER as smooth as you'd like. |
|
#145
|
|||
|
|||
|
nothing will load in the [censored] lobby [censored]
|
|
#146
|
|||
|
|||
|
are SNG's working for anyone?
|
|
#147
|
|||
|
|||
|
I have to say that I'm very disappointed with the quality of the software. People here at 2+2 have been complaining for weeks that the tables have button-click problems and that the Beta crashes after an hour of multi-tabling.
If there was ANYTHING that should have been sorted out before this update, it's the button-click problem and the crashing tables. Kudos for finally pushing a refresh on a very dated lobby, but shame on you for letting a buggy Beta ride for a over a month with no updates, only to roll the bugs into a major release. |
|
#148
|
|||
|
|||
|
I really like PP overall I've always kept ten times the bankroll on PP than on any other site but I played two MTT today the 109 NL and the 22 LHE... in the LHE the starting stack was 1k... and we still started off 20/40...
after only 36 minutes there are 363 players left *started with 664* almost half the field gone in a limit event within about a half hour... WTF? |
|
#149
|
|||
|
|||
|
I haven't read ALL the posts, but I'm hoping 1000 is a MISTAKE since the OTHER SNGs have 2000 chips (3-table as I cannot yet open 1table... lol). I'm hoping the main MTTs will have 2000 chips once they figure out that it didn't update. RIGHT?
|
|
#150
|
|||
|
|||
|
There is no information on the web pages concerning the size of starting stack for MTTs.
Otherwise the blind level increments are similar as in PokerStars. During first 6 levels, starting pots are 2x at Party. On later levels starting pots are 169-177 % of the corresponding PokerStars levels. Of course, without knowing the starting stack, a good comparison cannot be made. - mongeron |
![]() |
|
|