![]() |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Greatest Center Fielder | |||
| Ty Cobb |
|
26 | 13.61% |
| Joe Dimaggio |
|
14 | 7.33% |
| Mickey Mantle |
|
30 | 15.71% |
| Willie Mays |
|
119 | 62.30% |
| Tris Speaker |
|
1 | 0.52% |
| Somebody Else |
|
1 | 0.52% |
| Voters: 191. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1431
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
You, Me, backseat, now blake [/ QUOTE ] pics plz. |
|
#1432
|
|||
|
|||
|
The third one needs to be a control for this to be scientific. The message needs to be "Hey, let's meet up and [censored]."
|
|
#1433
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'm with BEP. I think you should do the 4 (your first 2, my suggestion, and BEP's control) though, and send out 25 of each. That way we get results for a single person AND cross-person results upon which proper scientific rigour can be applied.
EDIT: Actuallly, can you up it to 30 each (ie 120 posts each), cos I think that reaches a boundary to solid up the statistics better. EDIT 2: And you'll need to report back daily, possibly 12 hourly really. This thread will just leave you behind otherwise, and this sounds like sterling work that needs to help build this monument of OOTiocy properly. I truly believe we are building the 1st wonder of the second phase of the internet age here. |
|
#1434
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
Whoa, you have the Rounders tattoo. [/ QUOTE ] yea, yea funny thing is I got it before I saw the movie, no joke. |
|
#1435
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Whoa, you have the Rounders tattoo. [/ QUOTE ] yea, yea funny thing is I got it before I saw the movie, no joke. [/ QUOTE ] Nice. I think it's a cool tattoo idea, just unfortunate that it got associated with Rounders. |
|
#1436
|
|||
|
|||
|
SWEET!!! you can do it bro. Aussie chicks tend to be easy so I like your chances.
|
|
#1437
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] i have decided i do not have much desire to meet any of these people from myspace. for some reason i never liked it, and now after being a member for 2 days i can confirm i am not a fan. the people are either: -not quite attractive to me. -clearly complete morons. -annoying, lame, or bad personalities -are overly weird 'myspace chics'. -too young. -not interested. the only person i would actually be interested in would be someone 21-25, intelligent, attractive, good sense of humor, good personality, and not a 'myspace chic'. not happening anytime soon methinks. but i do wish everyone good luck in both getting laid, and causing some entertaining hindenburg style drama. since i rambled on, i will leave you with a profile of a girl from lexington that is the typical 'myspace!' and e-hipster that i can't quite stand. but she has a pretty cute face, and a tight body she likes e-flaunting, and crazy hair, and i am a fan of weird hair. for disclosure i messaged her a standard hello-esque message and received no reply. half naked pictures of somewhat cute e-hipster myspace chippey. [/ QUOTE ] That link belongs in the UrbanDictionary definition for "butterface." I completely understand why her head is not in half of those photos. Chuddo, are you actually looking for a gf through this endeavor? Cause for that kind of goal I agree, most of the girls you run into are not gonna satisfy personality requirements (and I look for the same things in girls as what you listed). Or can you just not even stand the types of girls you're finding for the length of time required to sleep with them (euphemistically, not literally, just so we're clear)? [/ QUOTE ]
|
|
#1438
|
|||
|
|||
|
I humbly request time to lift MyTurn2Raise's * - I LOLed.
|
|
#1439
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
I humbly request time to lift MyTurn2Raise's * - I LOLed. [/ QUOTE ] 2nd i loved it. blake |
|
#1440
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thanks for the laugh [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] That is a really nice pic [img]/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img]
|
![]() |
|
|