Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Micro Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: Would you rather be broke as a joke or a filthy rich overweight AxisOfEvilian?
Broke as a Joke 13 24.53%
Filthy rich overweight AxisOfEvilian 40 75.47%
Voters: 53. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1411  
Old 06-11-2007, 10:24 AM
Chomp Chomp is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Pretty terrible at poker
Posts: 2,183
Default Re: Official JUNE uNL **\'`MICROBREW THREAD`\'** LC/NC this way...

Thanks Gelford.

Sheesh. Bit depressing how far behind this stuff I am tbh.

Here's an odd thing though, that I've mentioned before. I must have looked at dozens and dozens and dozens of poker videos: Cardrunners, DynastyPoker, Isura, iStrong etc. etc. This encompasses all levels from 25NL up to Townswend and Caby playing 10/20NL.

In all that time (maybe 100 hours of poker played at all levels by very good players), I swear to God I have seen them making "moves" about 10 times in total. And these were primarily Caby playing beautiful power poker at hi stakes, which is obviously a game different in nature to the one us donks are playing.

Now, I know the concept of Merging Ranges is not a "move". It is more a matter of optimising value/bluffing/metagame considerations. But at the same time, I can look at a Townsed video and he is: betting for value always, bluffing in fairly obvious spots occasionally, always playing from position, folding wisely, exploiting weakness etc.

IOW, basic, basic stuff.

On any given river he is not looking to merge a range. He is looking to value bet or, occasionally, push a guy off a hand. Or whatever.

I guess what I am saying is that poker need not be as complex as we sometimes think, and while ceoncepts such as merging ranges helps us undertsnad the game better in an abstact sense (it deepens out thinking) it seems something Townsend/whoever does as part of a basic game anyway. Give it a name, sure, but it is still value-betting and/or semi-bluffing and/or pure bluff.


(Cliff notes: I am jealous that others understand complex poker theory I don't, so I am trying to convince myself - half-heartedly - that it really doesn't matter [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img])
  #1412  
Old 06-11-2007, 10:27 AM
Chomp Chomp is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Pretty terrible at poker
Posts: 2,183
Default Re: Official JUNE uNL **\'`MICROBREW THREAD`\'** LC/NC this way...

Bozzer - thanks, that's what I thought from reading the posts, but you explain it perfectly.
  #1413  
Old 06-11-2007, 10:37 AM
bozzer bozzer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: in with the 2p2 lingo
Posts: 2,140
Default Re: Official JUNE uNL **\'`MICROBREW THREAD`\'** LC/NC this way...

crap 49 posts left till my 1000th post!

edit: ok just to add something...

i think aba has a fundementally very simple set of ideas about poker - ranges, game theory etc. he doesn't seem to be massively into out levelling his opponent. (except when screwing Ivey with a fake misclick with KK lol). I'm sure he does make bets that he's not sure are for value or as bluffs though.

but you're right, whenever I watch a cr vid I nearly always think 'i could sit in that game'. the thing is 99% of highstakes play seems to be reasonably similar to SSNL play, but if you drop a stack making a stupid mistake during the 1% of tough hands that will kill your WR.
  #1414  
Old 06-11-2007, 10:54 AM
tms tms is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Williamsburg
Posts: 300
Default Re: Official JUNE uNL **\'`MICROBREW THREAD`\'** LC/NC this way...

yea i remember when a friend let me play 200NL on his account, granted it was back in the days of party and he was sitting right beside me, but won a few buyins in an hour using the ABC poker that I use today, thus my inspiration to keep moving up.
  #1415  
Old 06-11-2007, 11:02 AM
corsakh corsakh is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Kitty said what?
Posts: 3,991
Default Re: Official JUNE uNL **\'`MICROBREW THREAD`\'** LC/NC this way...

[ QUOTE ]
Thanks Gelford.

Sheesh. Bit depressing how far behind this stuff I am tbh.

Here's an odd thing though, that I've mentioned before. I must have looked at dozens and dozens and dozens of poker videos: Cardrunners, DynastyPoker, Isura, iStrong etc. etc. This encompasses all levels from 25NL up to Townswend and Caby playing 10/20NL.

In all that time (maybe 100 hours of poker played at all levels by very good players), I swear to God I have seen them making "moves" about 10 times in total. And these were primarily Caby playing beautiful power poker at hi stakes, which is obviously a game different in nature to the one us donks are playing.

Now, I know the concept of Merging Ranges is not a "move". It is more a matter of optimising value/bluffing/metagame considerations. But at the same time, I can look at a Townsed video and he is: betting for value always, bluffing in fairly obvious spots occasionally, always playing from position, folding wisely, exploiting weakness etc.

IOW, basic, basic stuff.

On any given river he is not looking to merge a range. He is looking to value bet or, occasionally, push a guy off a hand. Or whatever.

I guess what I am saying is that poker need not be as complex as we sometimes think, and while ceoncepts such as merging ranges helps us undertsnad the game better in an abstact sense (it deepens out thinking) it seems something Townsend/whoever does as part of a basic game anyway. Give it a name, sure, but it is still value-betting and/or semi-bluffing and/or pure bluff.


(Cliff notes: I am jealous that others understand complex poker theory I don't, so I am trying to convince myself - half-heartedly - that it really doesn't matter [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img])

[/ QUOTE ]

Perhaps it depends what a move is. Say raising donkbets and minraises is often profitable. Sometimes its high variance, but it has some benefits.
  #1416  
Old 06-11-2007, 11:04 AM
matrix matrix is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 7,050
Default Re: Official JUNE uNL **\'`MICROBREW THREAD`\'** LC/NC this way...

bleh.

Yesterday I played 50NL like a LAGTard.

Straight pwned some donks and lost 2 buy ins thanks to back to back 2 outters, nice.

Today I am playing 20/19/oo stuff and have paid off flopped sets twice with TPTK vs a couple of big fishies.

6 buyin downswing @ 50NL.

Goals for today.

i) Robusto
ii) stop playing like a retart and throwing away monies.
  #1417  
Old 06-11-2007, 11:07 AM
corsakh corsakh is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Kitty said what?
Posts: 3,991
Default Re: Official JUNE uNL **\'`MICROBREW THREAD`\'** LC/NC this way...

I can feel you. So hard to get away from TPTK against total tools.
  #1418  
Old 06-11-2007, 11:37 AM
KRS ONE KRS ONE is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 89
Default Re: Official JUNE uNL **\'`MICROBREW THREAD`\'** LC/NC this way...



Month to date.

A bit of consistency wouldn't go astray would it? [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]
  #1419  
Old 06-11-2007, 11:37 AM
prodonkey prodonkey is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: underrating women on teh interweb
Posts: 5,993
Default Re: Official JUNE uNL **\'`MICROBREW THREAD`\'** LC/NC this way...

LOL someone on stars hates me. I was playing my normal heads up sngs the other day, he won one and got cocky, wanted me to play 2 at once.. and I beat him like 7 in a row. He then asked me to stop playing him.. is this a reasonable request? He gets insanely mad if I sit with him, and tells me how rude I am for not respecting his wishes. He said he was going to email stars about me stalking him.

So what would you do? keep playing him? he's really bad and very easy $. Or be nice and not play him anymore?
  #1420  
Old 06-11-2007, 11:49 AM
Manchild84 Manchild84 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: , Tone
Posts: 919
Default Re: Official JUNE uNL **\'`MICROBREW THREAD`\'** LC/NC this way...

Probably not own thread worthy, so Ill check here with the brew.
is raising in these spots standard? likely going to be OOP and multiway, but still want to build a pot in case of set. I can see decent arguments both ways.

Party Poker - No Limit Hold'em Cash Game - $0.25/$0.50 Blinds - 6 Players - (LegoPoker HH Converter)

SB: $86.85
<font color="black">Hero (BB): $50.00</font>
UTG: $128.95
MP: $56.00
CO: $44.25
BTN: $14.25

<font color="black">Preflop:</font> Hero is dealt (6 Players)
UTG calls $0.50, MP folds, CO calls $0.50, BTN calls $0.50, SB calls $0.25, <font color="red">Hero raises to $3.00</font>, UTG calls $2.50, CO folds, BTN calls $2.50, SB folds
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.