|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: If Santana Moss doesn't play this week, who plays? | |||
| G. Jennings @ MIN |
   
|
2 | 22.22% |
| Re. Williams vs HOU |
  
|
7 | 77.78% |
| Ma. Clayton @ TEN |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| Voters: 9. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#131
10-29-2007, 11:23 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ***** Clash of the Titans, Week 9: NE @ Ind*****
Colts fans,
I am calling a truce with you mor....um, you guys for the remainder of the week. We are fans of two absolutely incredible teams, and I expect this game to be absolutely amazing. Also, I hope whoever wins Sunday's game finishes the season undefeated. That's right, if the Colts beat the Pats Sunday, I hope they finish the regular season undefeated. It'll be all the more sweeter when we end up as SB Champions. Pats 34 Colts 24 That's my prediction. 
|
|
#132
10-29-2007, 11:25 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ***** Clash of the Titans, Week 9: NE @ Ind*****
[ QUOTE ]
All this arguing about lines has distracted us from the real reason I came into this thread. Debunking the "solid" Redskins defense. [ QUOTE ] The Patriots performance against the Skins doesn't really say much IMO. The Skins offense is not good and facing a strong NE defense they were playing D all game. The Skins D is being severely overrated. They hadn't played even a good offense yet this season. [/ QUOTE ] Before the Pats, the Redskins faced the Fins, a struggling Eagles offense, a struggling NYG offense, the Lions, the 1 dimensional Packers, and the Cardinals. [/ QUOTE ] Out of curiosity, if none of those teams are good offenses, who ARE the good offenses, at least in the NFC?
|
|
#135
10-29-2007, 11:44 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ***** Clash of the Titans, Week 9: NE @ Ind*****
[ QUOTE ]
Good Os in the NFC: Dallas, Giants-The rest are terrible. [/ QUOTE ] So how could Washington's defense be "overrated" if they've played good defense against conference-level offenses?
|
|
#136
10-29-2007, 11:46 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ***** Clash of the Titans, Week 9: NE @ Ind*****
They weren't overrated, they were just overmatched. As a note, they haven't played Dallas yet and the Os that have played haven't been particularly good. They have had a favorable early season schedule. Miami, Philly, Detroit, @GB, Arizona all have pretty bad Os this year.
|
|
#137
10-29-2007, 11:51 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ***** Clash of the Titans, Week 9: NE @ Ind*****
Every teams' defense has been overmatched this year by the Pats O. It seems like there are only 5/6 total offenses in the NFL that anybody would consider "good"
|
|
#138
10-29-2007, 12:55 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ***** Clash of the Titans, Week 9: NE @ Ind*****
[ QUOTE ]
They weren't overrated, they were just overmatched. As a note, they haven't played Dallas yet and the Os that have played haven't been particularly good. They have had a favorable early season schedule. Miami, Philly, Detroit, @GB, Arizona all have pretty bad Os this year. [/ QUOTE ] When the redskins played them, GB and the Lions had the top passing offenses in the NFC iirc. The Lions in particular had a highly touted "high power offense" that was held to 3 points. Skins defense is overrated but not by much.
|
|
#139
10-29-2007, 01:06 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ***** Clash of the Titans, Week 9: NE @ Ind*****
Yeah, I don't get how the Redskins are overrated when they held 4 of the top 7 scoring offenses in the NFC, the Giants, Packers, Cardinals and Lions to 16 PPG. I think they actually did a good job stopping Moss and Stallworth as they combined for only 7 catches and less than 100 yards. And they didn't even get most of those catches until after Brady had blown open the game with his other weapons.
|
|
#140
10-29-2007, 01:24 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ***** Clash of the Titans, Week 9: NE @ Ind*****
Anyone think the Colts are looking ahead to San Diego?
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
