|
|
#131
02-22-2006, 06:44 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Best (online) players on 2+2?
[ QUOTE ]
It's ridiculous (please people, note the correct spelling of this word, there is no "e" in it) [/ QUOTE ] I was just going to make a post in OOT on this exact word. I can't take it anymore. We have guys with an IQ of a billion playing for assloads of money that can't spell common words. 
|
|
#132
02-22-2006, 06:51 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Best (online) players on 2+2?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] It's ridiculous (please people, note the correct spelling of this word, there is no "e" in it) [/ QUOTE ] I was just going to make a post in OOT on this exact word. I can't take it anymore. We have guys with an IQ of a billion playing for assloads of money that can't spell common words. [/ QUOTE ] Yep. The two that get me the most or r"e"diculous and defin"a"te (people...it has the same root as infinite...It's not infinate!!). And if people learn how to properly use apostrophes in "it's"/"its", I'll start to weep tears of joy.
|
|
#133
02-22-2006, 06:52 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Best (online) players on 2+2?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] It's ridiculous (please people, note the correct spelling of this word, there is no "e" in it) [/ QUOTE ] I was just going to make a post in OOT on this exact word. I can't take it anymore. We have guys with an IQ of a billion playing for assloads of money that can't spell common words. [/ QUOTE ] Hey morans, you would get pwned hard if you posted that in OOT.
|
|
#134
02-22-2006, 06:54 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Best (online) players on 2+2?
Why don't you nits go nuts about 'seperate'?
|
|
#135
02-22-2006, 07:05 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Best (online) players on 2+2?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] It's ridiculous (please people, note the correct spelling of this word, there is no "e" in it) [/ QUOTE ] I was just going to make a post in OOT on this exact word. I can't take it anymore. We have guys with an IQ of a billion playing for assloads of money that can't spell common words. [/ QUOTE ] Hey morans, you would get pwned hard if you posted that in OOT. [/ QUOTE ] I'm not talking 2+2speak or obvious typos.
|
|
#137
02-22-2006, 07:35 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Best (online) players on 2+2?
[ QUOTE ]
I'm not sure if you've played with him or not or how you know this, but in the times that I've played high limit holdem with him, he has played very well. There are a lot of good posters on this forum and ranking them is lame, but he's in the top category from what I have seen in real play. [/ QUOTE ] Thanks for the praise J_V, I've said the same about you. In fact I'm shocked daryn made a judgment about me without ever playing with me (with that 50/100 game 2 months ago aside).
|
|
#139
02-22-2006, 07:37 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Best (online) players on 2+2?
Rduke,
For many, rediculous falls into this category. Also, remember that English is not the first language of some posters, so you can't hammer someone too hard for phonetic errors just because they are from Portugal. Regards, 4_2
|
|
#140
02-22-2006, 07:47 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Best (online) players on 2+2?
[ QUOTE ]
Rduke, For many, rediculous falls into this category. Also, remember that English is not the first language of some posters, so you can't hammer someone too hard for phonetic errors just because they are from Portugal. Regards, 4_2 [/ QUOTE ] The last I'll say on this because this hijack has gone on waaaay too long. I took care to point this out in response to NOBODY. I'm not pointing out anybody's error. I'm just pointing out common errors. Josh
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
