![]() |
|
#131
|
|||
|
|||
|
copy paste
|
|
#132
|
|||
|
|||
|
Is that for all the games, and whats the starting date for it?
|
|
#133
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] dunno if this has been posted but here are some other numbers worth checking out... http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/7...1/1600/901.jpg [/ QUOTE ]link not working, can anyone rehost? [/ QUOTE ] It's posted in this thread a little bit ago link |
|
#134
|
|||
|
|||
|
Updated SS based on what we can gather from taobot's posts. This is only for omaha games.
|
|
#135
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Mike Matusow: it not money anyways Mike Matusow: its computer numbers [/ QUOTE ] omfg classic [/ QUOTE ] i'm calling BS, no way matusow can type 7 words without spelling any of them wrong |
|
#136
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
Is it m e or is it mostly the live players have these stupid ideas. I haven't seen the primarily internet players min buying, but Ivey, Cunninham, Benyamine, etc. are min buying very frequently. pro's love cap games! [/ QUOTE ] The idea behind min buying is to beat the table with the table's money. If you min buy for $40 at $200NL all you are trying to do is get your money in with the best hand alot of players will call an all in from a short stack that they might not call a $40 reraise from a larger stack. It's a good way to get calls on big pairs. Once you get your chips up to an average stack, everything else you're doing is icing on the cake. If you should happen to lose, oh well you only really lost $40. It doesn't work everytime but it can be an effective strategy |
|
#137
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Is it m e or is it mostly the live players have these stupid ideas. I haven't seen the primarily internet players min buying, but Ivey, Cunninham, Benyamine, etc. are min buying very frequently. pro's love cap games! [/ QUOTE ] The idea behind min buying is to beat the table with the table's money. If you min buy for $40 at $200NL all you are trying to do is get your money in with the best hand alot of players will call an all in from a short stack that they might not call a $40 reraise from a larger stack. It's a good way to get calls on big pairs. Once you get your chips up to an average stack, everything else you're doing is icing on the cake. If you should happen to lose, oh well you only really lost $40. It doesn't work everytime but it can be an effective strategy [/ QUOTE ] Yes it very effectively bastardizes any sort of etiquette or ethics poker has. |
|
#138
|
|||
|
|||
|
So basically Sagstrom and Antonius own everyone.
|
|
#139
|
|||
|
|||
|
Pretty sick statistics
|
|
#140
|
|||
|
|||
|
seems like Benyamine is in the second tier of winners, supporting DCJ's kuckoo claims throughout the thread.
|
![]() |
|
|