![]() |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: what to do? | |||
| Push - you have a flush |
|
15 | 71.43% |
| Fold - he must have the nuts |
|
6 | 28.57% |
| Voters: 21. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#121
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] < 1 I don't believe in the bell curve for rating women, by the way. I'm easily repulsed by nasty ladies. [/ QUOTE ] that's another big issue with these polls. people get worked up because they think someone is a 2 (meaning 80% are better looking) while others think she's a 4 (using the normal distribution, meaning 1 sd below average) and really they mean about the same thing. [/ QUOTE ] This isn't true. pirateboy sees no difference between the two in the mcdonald's pic and the 3 1's in the OPs pic #3 and he's FOS. If he was forced to choose to bang one of them on the threat of death, he'd certainly mentally rank them quickly. [/ QUOTE ] Im with him, there is no difference between a chick that is 250, and a chick that is 200, Im not banging either one of them, they are both ones. Pirateboy is right. [/ QUOTE ] guids, did you miss the part about "threat of death"? |
|
#122
|
|||
|
|||
|
3-4...how's 3.5 sound?
|
|
#123
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] < 1 I don't believe in the bell curve for rating women, by the way. I'm easily repulsed by nasty ladies. [/ QUOTE ] that's another big issue with these polls. people get worked up because they think someone is a 2 (meaning 80% are better looking) while others think she's a 4 (using the normal distribution, meaning 1 sd below average) and really they mean about the same thing. [/ QUOTE ] This isn't true. pirateboy sees no difference between the two in the mcdonald's pic and the 3 1's in the OPs pic #3 and he's FOS. If he was forced to choose to bang one of them on the threat of death, he'd certainly mentally rank them quickly. [/ QUOTE ] Im with him, there is no difference between a chick that is 250, and a chick that is 200, Im not banging either one of them, they are both ones. Pirateboy is right. [/ QUOTE ] guids, did you miss the part about "threat of death"? [/ QUOTE ] ya I did, its retarded to bring crap like that up. in real life when does that happen? why put retarded conditions on it? IRL, if I am unwiling to sleep with a chick she is going to be a 1. There is no "degrees" of ugliness. there are ugly chicks, and then there si the rest fo the population that you can catagorize. |
|
#124
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
Rushmore, Lindsay Davenport is not a four. ![]() ![]() [/ QUOTE ] Dear Sir, While I find it difficult to disagree with you here at The 2+2 Forums due in large part to the overwhelming amount of reverence you seem to inspire in many of the denizens here, I must--ahem--ummm, well...sh*t; I disagree. There, I said it. The photos you posted bring her up to a SIX, maybe, and they're freaking publicity shots. I'll concede a FIVE, but no higher. Please don't get me banned or anything, OK? |
|
#125
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
ya I did, its retarded to bring crap like that up. in real life when does that happen? why put retarded conditions on it? IRL, if I am unwiling to sleep with a chick she is going to be a 1. There is no "degrees" of ugliness. there are ugly chicks, and then there si the rest fo the population that you can catagorize. [/ QUOTE ] guids wins again. FTR, Davenport is definitely a 7. Athleticism = hot. |
|
#126
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
FTR, Davenport is definitely a 7. Athleticism = hot. [/ QUOTE ] Dude, have you started smoking your crack already? |
|
#127
|
|||
|
|||
|
definately not a 1 , definately not a 5 either.
|
|
#128
|
|||
|
|||
|
Are these chicks from England by chance?
I voted 3, I would have voted 3.7 had there been an option, and there should have been, because clearly we're all debating over a few tenths of a point. |
|
#129
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] FTR, Davenport is definitely a 7. Athleticism = hot. [/ QUOTE ] Dude, have you started smoking your crack already? [/ QUOTE ] I have a huge thing for any decent-looking sports-playing chick. Martina Hingis is a 10, for example. And it's LSD. Not crack. |
|
#130
|
|||
|
|||
|
El Diablo,
In the formula: APS - x = THR where APS = "Airbrushed Publicity Shot" and THR = "True Hotness Rating," what value do you place on X? IMO, x = 2. And Davenport is not >7 in those photos. |
![]() |
|
|