Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Tournament Poker > Tournament Circuit/WSOP
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #121  
Old 08-11-2006, 06:05 PM
NCAces NCAces is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Cary, NC
Posts: 864
Default Re: Jamie Gold...Worst Possible Winner?

[ QUOTE ]
ZBT and others,

I think most of you vastly overestimate the influence of what particular individual happens to win the WSOP has on the growth of the game.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes ... another example of where 2p2 members forget that they are the poker fringe. Most of the 30 or so guys who play in our monthly tournaments couldn't name anyone but Moneymaker ... yet, they donate monthly.
Reply With Quote
  #122  
Old 08-11-2006, 06:11 PM
NCAces NCAces is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Cary, NC
Posts: 864
Default Re: Jamie Gold...Worst Possible Winner?

[ QUOTE ]
They did leave out that he had played live cash games a LOT in the past. It is all about how ESPN pushes someone.
~Justin

[/ QUOTE ]

Which leads to ... how can ZBT or anyone know whether Gold will be good or not until we know how ESPN creates him? It really is up to ESPN ... they can make him out to be a great guy, or a jerk. I am guessing that you will hear very little of the table talk ... or at least none that will make him look like a tool.

We have to remember that we saw the whole thing over 10 days, thousands of posts in dozens of sweat threads, and then 12 hours of PPV. We saw the unadulterated and unedited Gold (whom I happened to like). But what the people you are hoping will start playing poker because of the WSOP will see ... well, we have no idea.

NCAces
Reply With Quote
  #123  
Old 08-11-2006, 06:14 PM
ZBTHorton ZBTHorton is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: SSNL Coaches PM ME!!
Posts: 6,587
Default Re: Jamie Gold...Worst Possible Winner?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
They did leave out that he had played live cash games a LOT in the past. It is all about how ESPN pushes someone.
~Justin

[/ QUOTE ]

Which leads to ... how can ZBT or anyone know whether Gold will be good or not until we know how ESPN creates him? It really is up to ESPN ... they can make him out to be a great guy, or a jerk. I am guessing that you will hear very little of the table talk ... or at least none that will make him look like a tool.

We have to remember that we saw the whole thing over 10 days, thousands of posts in dozens of sweat threads, and then 12 hours of PPV. We saw the unadulterated and unedited Gold (whom I happened to like). But what the people you are hoping will start playing poker because of the WSOP will see ... well, we have no idea.

NCAces

[/ QUOTE ]

What would be great, is if ESPN focused on him donating money to charity and doing it for his father.

That would obviously be awesome.
Reply With Quote
  #124  
Old 08-11-2006, 06:19 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Post deleted by Ryan Beal

Reply With Quote
  #125  
Old 08-11-2006, 06:20 PM
NCAces NCAces is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Cary, NC
Posts: 864
Default Re: Jamie Gold...Worst Possible Winner?

[ QUOTE ]
zbt,

do you really think the early 20s male demographic needs to be further incited to play poker? every frat boy i know already plays poker. hell, look at the average age of 2p2.

[/ QUOTE ]

I am 47 and not offended by what you said. I do think you are wrong that this is a negative. I assure you that if you are looking for donks who you want at your tables with $500 they don't mind dropping for a night of fun, my age group can handle that better than some college kid or new graduate.

If you look at it from pure marketing, what is the most desirable demographic for TV? It would be people in my age group that have substantial disposable income. I recognize that the younger crowd is the favored demographic for movies, clothes, mall-stuff, but when it comes to disposable income, you can't beat the 45 - 55 age group -- which, by the way, is what I think middle-aged is.

Many in my age group would be turned off by those you think are desireable. Someone my age wants to know that I don't have to be 23 years old in order to survive the rigors of a 10 day tournament; or need to have a bunch of years to learn the game. Moreover, someone like Pralad would have been terrible if he had started to rap ... you think Gold's talking was bad ... let some of us who more than just hate rap hear that at a table and run in the opposite direction.

NCAces
Reply With Quote
  #126  
Old 08-11-2006, 06:21 PM
Uglyowl Uglyowl is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: They r who we thought they were
Posts: 4,406
Default Re: Jamie Gold...Worst Possible Winner?

Villians to some degree are great for a sport. If my Red Sox are out of it, I will watch any Yankees games to root against them.

It was them same way with Hellmuth and Matusow (although I kind of like them at times now).
Reply With Quote
  #127  
Old 08-11-2006, 06:22 PM
NCAces NCAces is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Cary, NC
Posts: 864
Default Re: Jamie Gold...Worst Possible Winner?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
They did leave out that he had played live cash games a LOT in the past. It is all about how ESPN pushes someone.
~Justin

[/ QUOTE ]

Which leads to ... how can ZBT or anyone know whether Gold will be good or not until we know how ESPN creates him? It really is up to ESPN ... they can make him out to be a great guy, or a jerk. I am guessing that you will hear very little of the table talk ... or at least none that will make him look like a tool.

We have to remember that we saw the whole thing over 10 days, thousands of posts in dozens of sweat threads, and then 12 hours of PPV. We saw the unadulterated and unedited Gold (whom I happened to like). But what the people you are hoping will start playing poker because of the WSOP will see ... well, we have no idea.

NCAces

[/ QUOTE ]

What would be great, is if ESPN focused on him donating money to charity and doing it for his father.

That would obviously be awesome.

[/ QUOTE ]

And, of course they will. It is in their best interest to make Gold a good guy. They want the boom to continue. I can't see making him a jerk would be at all +EV for ESPN and WSOP.
Reply With Quote
  #128  
Old 08-11-2006, 06:22 PM
ZBTHorton ZBTHorton is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: SSNL Coaches PM ME!!
Posts: 6,587
Default Re: Jamie Gold...Worst Possible Winner?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

Anyone old
Anyone who didn't speak english
Anyone who didn't want to represent the game
Anyone rich
Anyone who represented themself very poorly at the table
Anyone who would cause "average people" to dislike them at the table.

Jamie Gold is middle aged.

[/ QUOTE ]

This other stuff I don't care about but anyone who calls me "middle-aged" is going to be hunted down and destroyed with all the power an elite champion of poker can bring to bear.

[/ QUOTE ]

Great.
Reply With Quote
  #129  
Old 08-11-2006, 06:22 PM
trying2learn trying2learn is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: vegas
Posts: 2,430
Default Re: Jamie Gold...Worst Possible Winner?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

Anyone old
Anyone who didn't speak english
Anyone who didn't want to represent the game
Anyone rich
Anyone who represented themself very poorly at the table
Anyone who would cause "average people" to dislike them at the table.

Jamie Gold is middle aged.

[/ QUOTE ]

This other stuff I don't care about but anyone who calls me "middle-aged" is going to be hunted down and destroyed with all the power an elite champion of poker can bring to bear.

[/ QUOTE ]

Welcome & congrats Jamie...these threads always get back to a closer to proper tone once the subject shows up. Hope to see you around the boards more often.
Reply With Quote
  #130  
Old 08-11-2006, 06:22 PM
Isura Isura is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 13,926
Default Re: Jamie Gold...Worst Possible Winner?

[ QUOTE ]

It's nice to see the player who outplayed the table win.

[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.