![]() |
|
#121
|
|||
|
|||
|
Terrible plays? Prahlad raises(how many raises you think he makes?) My M is around 5, I push 88, what is wrong with that?
If you notice cardplayer has the 55 hand wrong, he actually came over the top with 55 in late position with an M of 5, what are these guys supposed to do wait for AA with an M of 5? |
|
#122
|
|||
|
|||
|
Looks like Rizen lost a pot, then won a big one. 2.4 mil
|
|
#123
|
|||
|
|||
|
Your 100-1 longshot is in some serious Jamshidi.
|
|
#124
|
|||
|
|||
|
Rizen up to $2.4M.
|
|
#125
|
|||
|
|||
|
19-27 get $495k, 16-18 get $660k, 13-15 get $907k, and 10-12 get $1154k.
|
|
#126
|
|||
|
|||
|
Rizen at table 2 now.
|
|
#127
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
Terrible plays? Prahlad raises(how many raises you think he makes?) My M is around 5, I push 88, what is wrong with that? If you notice cardplayer has the 55 hand wrong, he actually came over the top with 55 in late position with an M of 5, what are these guys supposed to do wait for AA with an M of 5? [/ QUOTE ] Okay, they were desperately shortstacked, I stand corrected. But they are still terrible plays. It's pretty basic theory that when you have M < 5 the most important thing is being the first one in the pot so that you have some fold equity. |
|
#128
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Those plays are fine. They were short stacked. [/ QUOTE ] No, that does not make those plays fine, even if they were desperately shortstacked. And they weren't desperately shortstacked. [/ QUOTE ] Prahlad can be, and often is, raising with anything. You are too results oriented. |
|
#129
|
|||
|
|||
|
Where are you guys getting your updates from?
? |
|
#130
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'm not being results-oriented at all. I highly doubt Prahlad is raising junk from UTG with three short-stacks behind him. He's not an idiot. Especially when he doesn't have many chips himself.
|
![]() |
|
|