![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'm IN
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
card,
OK, finally the motivation I needed. Starting Monday I am gonna play a lot of 600NL until I have the full 30k Party bankroll I want to have in place before I start playing 25/50 full time. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
no 6m? Rigged.
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
no 6m? Rigged. [/ QUOTE ] Obviously we have to wait for Stars to implement this first. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ummm... 6 buyins? Are you joking?
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
Ummm... 6 buyins? Are you joking? [/ QUOTE ] yea, because el d's full BR is 30k. no way he has more money other than whats on his PP acct refer to my avatar |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Ummm... 6 buyins? Are you joking? [/ QUOTE ] yea, because el d's full BR is 30k. no way he has more money other than whats on his PP acct refer to my avatar [/ QUOTE ] you need to figure out how to change that hand into a baseball bat. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
i can spell:
el d is a rich old man ;-) |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
L,
No, very serious, dude. The variance in higher stakes games is higher because they are more aggressive, so I really think you should have at least 4 buyins before playing them. Chances of losing 2 buyins just being unlucky is pretty high. Normally, having a cushion of that much is OK, but these games are so aggressive that I think it is smart to at least have an ADDITIONAL 1 or 2 buyins available beyond that. So, yeah, I'm serious. Maybe a bit conservative, but I just think it's smart poker to be fully rolled for AT LEAST 5, but preferably 6 or 7 buyins, when moving to these stakes. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
why is lolotrickedu buying in half stacked?
|
![]() |
|
|