Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Puzzles and Other Games
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: Do my friends owe for Sunday night?
Yes, cheap bastards 60 61.86%
No, you are the cheap bastard 37 38.14%
Voters: 97. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1261  
Old 01-28-2007, 10:53 PM
ScottHoward ScottHoward is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: ninjaing teh fvch out of people
Posts: 11,066
Default Re: Curtains vs PoG

b5
Reply With Quote
  #1262  
Old 01-28-2007, 11:13 PM
fluorescenthippo fluorescenthippo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: on the bubble of life
Posts: 4,498
Default Re: Curtains vs PoG

nf3
Reply With Quote
  #1263  
Old 01-29-2007, 07:14 AM
beenben beenben is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: w/in my Bankroll
Posts: 2,076
Default Re: Curtains vs PoG

I'm not married to Nf3 but how about some b5 analysis? what are you trying to accomplish? why is better than the knight move?
Reply With Quote
  #1264  
Old 01-29-2007, 11:13 AM
StregaChess StregaChess is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Support Ron Paul for President
Posts: 1,096
Default Re: Curtains vs PoG

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
44. g5?! Nf3
45. Bf6 b5!

Maybe now is the time....

[/ QUOTE ]

What am I missing? Doesn't 46. Kc5, lose the pawn?

[/ QUOTE ]

The main point of Nf3 (at least in my head) is that he's not able to play f4. So the g pawn is just hanging in the wind. Yes 46. Kc5 drops the pawn and we don't care as we just want squares to advance our king.
(example but maybe not best)
44. g5 Nf3
45. Bf6 b5 (he also has 45. Be3)
46. Kc5 Ke6
47. Kxb5 Kf5
The pawn has to drop and our king and knight are way better positioned than his K & B, good enough to win? Hmmmm.. maybe not... but we should be in the driver seat...

Playing 44.... b5 may also be good but it does allow f4 and we don't have the same weakness at g5. Possibly f4 is not good and we get others stuff, but from a brain cell point of view 44... Nf3 was more forced and easier to follow...
Reply With Quote
  #1265  
Old 01-29-2007, 12:22 PM
TimM TimM is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: The Gym
Posts: 4,564
Default Re: Curtains vs PoG

[ QUOTE ]

44. g5 Nf3
45. Bf6 b5 (he also has 45. Be3)
46. Kc5 Ke6
47. Kxb5 Kf5
The pawn has to drop and our king and knight are way better positioned than his K & B, good enough to win? Hmmmm.. maybe not... but we should be in the driver seat...

[/ QUOTE ]

With 48.Kc5 Nxg5 49.Bxg5 Kxg5 50.Kd4 followed by 51.Ke3 White draws easily.

[ QUOTE ]
Playing 44.... b5 may also be good but it does allow f4 and we don't have the same weakness at g5. Possibly f4 is not good and we get others stuff, but from a brain cell point of view 44... Nf3 was more forced and easier to follow...

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't think 44...b5 changes much. 45.f5 b4 might be good for us, but he has other moves. 45.Bc3 Nf3 46.Bf6 b4 47.Kc4 is the same as the 44...Nf3 line above.
Reply With Quote
  #1266  
Old 01-29-2007, 05:22 PM
StregaChess StregaChess is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Support Ron Paul for President
Posts: 1,096
Default Re: Curtains vs PoG

[ QUOTE ]

With 48.Kc5 Nxg5 49.Bxg5 Kxg5 50.Kd4 followed by 51.Ke3 White draws easily.


[/ QUOTE ]

OK I confess my assumption was that Bxg5 would lead to a won ending for us. True we can't stop his king from getting back and even if we gain the opposition I assume its a draw. I'm sure if we are crafty we could play for a win in this position and LOSE....

Which path do you prefer pushing the b pawn?
I don't think 44...b5 changes much. 45.f5 b4 might be good for us, but he has other moves. 45.Bc3 Nf3 46.Bf6 b4 47.Kc4 is the same as the 44...Nf3 line above.

[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
  #1267  
Old 01-29-2007, 05:37 PM
durron597 durron597 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Folding
Posts: 30,000
Default Re: Curtains vs PoG

um, why haven't we been talking about

44. ... Nf3
45. Be3
Reply With Quote
  #1268  
Old 01-29-2007, 05:38 PM
durron597 durron597 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Folding
Posts: 30,000
Default Re: Curtains vs PoG

[ QUOTE ]
um, why haven't we been talking about

44. ... Nf3
45. Be3

[/ QUOTE ]

45. ... b5
46. Kc5

do we have any response at all?
Reply With Quote
  #1269  
Old 01-29-2007, 06:20 PM
TimM TimM is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: The Gym
Posts: 4,564
Default Re: Curtains vs PoG

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
um, why haven't we been talking about

44. ... Nf3
45. Be3

[/ QUOTE ]

45. ... b5
46. Kc5

do we have any response at all?

[/ QUOTE ]

After 46...Ke6 it will be very similar to the lines we have already discussed, unless he tries to vary with 47.g4 but that's just bad. 47...Nh2 48.Kxb5 Nxg4 49.Bd4 Kf5 and now he has to lose another pawn.

Even with all this he still has very good drawing chances by running his king back to e2 (the idea is to trade pawns when we try to create a passer, then sacrifice his bishop for our last pawn). I'd gladly take it over whatever else we might be able to get, but it just shows how hard it is for White to make a mistake big enough to lose the game.
Reply With Quote
  #1270  
Old 01-29-2007, 09:59 PM
StregaChess StregaChess is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Support Ron Paul for President
Posts: 1,096
Default Re: Curtains vs PoG

[ QUOTE ]



With 48.Kc5 Nxg5 49.Bxg5 Kxg5 50.Kd4 followed by 51.Ke3 White draws easily.


[/ QUOTE ]

I gave this a second look are you sure about this? I mean "easily"..... Maybe I should look for you on ICC tonight... or maybe I just excited that Heroes is coming on and I can't think straight.. LOL
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.