|
|
#112
05-29-2006, 03:19 PM
|
|||
|
|||
A message to Dids
Dids,
I have no interest in this thread whatsoever. Please keep idiots like Clayton from starting a flame war with me. It has been long established that Smoothcall and I are not the same person. Please delete Clayton's post inferring that Mason and Mat Sklansky were both lying when they confirmed our seperate identities. I would have sent a PM but they are disabled. Oh, one other thing. I understand that this is a news, views and gossip forum but to see a Moderator (Josh) come here and call a poster a "d-bag" might just discourage others to participate in 2 + 2 forum (open)discussions. Vince 
|
|
#113
05-29-2006, 05:02 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
I am putting 2 to1 on Smoothcall in Heads Up Match vs Goering
Any takers. I believe Smoothcall is better then Goering in limit and no limit take your pick.I hope to see this match soon. Smoothcall is one of the best against any of the top players. He in fact may be able to beat all of them that includes the Hellmuth and Mortinson. I would like to see this match but worry about each others reputation being at risk. So I don't think it will happen.
|
|
#114
05-29-2006, 05:07 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Alan Goerhing
post deleted - Dids
|
|
#115
05-29-2006, 05:25 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Alan Goerhing
Vince,
I'll delete insulting posts, but Clayton's stays. Taking what Clayton said and referencing it as Clayton suggestion that Mason is lying is exactly the kind of thing that makes people compare you to Smoothcall. There's nothing wrong with somebody making that inference.
|
|
#116
05-29-2006, 05:47 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Alan Goerhing
[ QUOTE ]
I'll delete insulting posts, but Clayton's stays [/ QUOTE ] Obviously, only posts of those those that you don't like. You either don't read so well or are just plain bias. I believe the latter is true. I have no problem beng compared with Smoothcall. You seem to believe and behave as if something is wrong with smoothcall. You are very biased and unfair because of your attitude. Clayton did not compare me with smoothcall. He claimed that smoothcall is an alias of mine. That's what aka means. Maybe you dont understand that or maybe you are just an unfair person I don't know which. As far as inferring that Mason and Mat Sklansky are liars that is precisely what Clayton is doing. Both have come up on this forum and stated that they know Smoothcall and we are not one in the same. So if you accept Clayton's remarks hen you agree that Mason and Mat are liars. Plain and simple. For once please see the truth and take the appropriate correct action delete Clayton's post and reprimand him as you did (unjustifiably) to Smoothcall. You caim to remove insulting posts. Clayton is insulting me and I had absolutely nothing to do with this thread. Vince
|
|
#117
05-29-2006, 05:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Alan Goerhing
why is it when you and smoothcall get involved in a thread it so often seems to give me a headache while reading it?
it's uncanny.
|
|
#118
05-29-2006, 06:07 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Alan Goerhing
[ QUOTE ]
why is it when you and smoothcall get involved in a thread it so often seems to give me a headache while reading it? it's uncanny. [/ QUOTE ] Why do people even read their posts? I find them really easy to skip,and I doubt I am any less enlightened for doing so.
|
|
#119
05-29-2006, 06:09 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Alan Goerhing
nobody cares about your head. If you did you wouldn't read anything that i posted. I wasn't involved in this thread until you under your alias Clayton brought me in.
Vince
|
|
#120
05-29-2006, 06:10 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Alan Goerhing
[ QUOTE ]
Why do people even read their posts? [/ QUOTE ] Thank you! Vince
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
