![]() |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Who has the long term edge? Ivey v. aba (NLHU) | |||
| Ivey |
|
34 | 30.09% |
| aba |
|
42 | 37.17% |
| BBV |
|
37 | 32.74% |
| Voters: 113. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1091
|
|||
|
|||
|
Can anyone put the backs from these cards in Fozzy's 5.0C deck? I've tried, but I'm only working w/MS Paint and I end up w/ green borders and it looks pretty cruddy. Thanks for any help!
[ QUOTE ] ![]() [/ QUOTE ] |
|
#1092
|
|||
|
|||
|
Everlong,
http://poker.wikia.com/images/1/16/B...x-Everlong.jpg How much do you want to make a table like this for Classic view? Preferably one with the color the way you have it or similar, and then also one with the same table and an all-black background. No table at all might work too if you just had the Full Tilt logo fading nicely into black somehow. Right now I just use a solid grey rectangle (which I like better than every Classic table I could find, and may use no matter what as it's hard to imagine how anything could "work" better). I like classic view better and find it better for PAHUD. The seats look better than Race Track too IMO, and I never messed with Full Tilt Shortcuts to see if I could use modded player boxes. I know the thought originally was that they might only offer Race Track in the future, but I just don't find this that likely. Discontinue a style (that some people clearly prefer) that they've offered for a long time now now just to avoid updating the graphics? I wouldn't know, I just find it less likely than OP does (though I certainly understand not wanting to spend time making mods to help others out when they'll become useless in the future). Let me know if you'd be willing to do what I requested for a price. I'd like to have a couple options other than the grey. I understand if not and thanks for sharing the Race Track table. |
|
#1093
|
|||
|
|||
|
I could prolly make some (similar) backs to those. I wouldnt want to cut/paste them. But I can try and get close to that look.
In fact, I have some I made for another requester, that are very similar. Hopefully he is still reading this thread. I forget who it was, but I just made this Red a bit darker than the last preview. [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]. No promises on how soon I will do it - but i wrote it on my "to-do" list. [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img] Keep in mind, that there are quite a few requests on my list. [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]
|
|
#1094
|
|||
|
|||
|
i am stuck on 5.x like a stalker, but this 7.x is real good. add the bright backs and 7.x will be a very good alternate on the right table.
|
|
#1095
|
|||
|
|||
|
The bright backs were actually on those cards - I deleted that layer- when I decided to try those MFG backs.
It will prolly take me a half hour to put those solid backs on the cards3.psd, and make a new deck from the existing one. Then about the same time to post/code at wiki. I was planning on putting solid backs on those, as that is my standard back. Then I found all these cool MFG card backs, and couldn't help myself. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] I am assuming you are referring to the 7.3K that I put on the The Wikia Page . There are some other 7.x in this thread, just want to be sure you mean the 7.3K at wikia. [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] Most people seemed to have gravitated toward one or two of a select few of my (many) decks. It seems they have a lot wider range of what they think the proper card back is. Luckily the backs are the easiest tweak to do to an existing deck. |
|
#1096
|
|||
|
|||
|
OK - Please don't laugh. My first table from scratch. I honestly didn't spend enough time on it at all. It needs a padded rail - at the very least.
But I wanted to see how it looked with a really over-sized table. Let me know what you think. Version 0.1 [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]
|
|
#1097
|
|||
|
|||
|
@fozzy
thanks but I am seriously really happy with 5.4 and the paizley backs. the only thing I think has potential of getting better is the font itself. but i on't have any better suggestions. you are right about tables from scratch but I am teh lazy @a nonymous I don't have the original background for the bordeaux table saved so I made a new similar gradient. are these what you meant? ![]() ![]() (if you feel like contributing to teh gambling it's TheMcAnic on FTP.) edit: check the wikia I added some alternatives |
|
#1098
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
the only thing I think has potential of getting better is the font itself. but i on't have any better suggestions. [/ QUOTE ] Agreed. I know there are better fonts out there. That was the best one I could find on my PC. I have looked a few times on web sites. [img]/images/graemlins/crazy.gif[/img] That is not any fun. Considering emailing a font site for help finding one possibly, but I am lazy too. [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] |
|
#1099
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#1100
|
|||
|
|||
|
Why the need for table outlines, rails etc? Why not as simple as this:
A monotone background makes everything easy on the eye and easy to place PAhud numbers exactly where you want them (not shown, posting this from wrong computer). |
![]() |
|
|