|
|
#101
07-26-2006, 05:16 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Monster Penis Size
THat smells a lot like spam there chief.
|
|
#102
07-26-2006, 05:33 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Monster tables
A fish migration hypo-thesis: the monster has lured them from the monsterless shallows? I've never seen so much calling.
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] There are currently no 25NL or 50NL "montser" tables, so the rake is as usual. [/ QUOTE ] Any idea if they're planning on implementing monster tables at those levels? [/ QUOTE ] Somewhere I read a response from Party CS that they don't plan on doing it at the moment. [/ QUOTE ]
|
|
#103
07-26-2006, 05:47 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Monster Penis Size
Ok. Sorry, I thought the result was in relation with your winrate, but after thinking about it a little more is not. ie. if the structure of the hands is more or less always the same the lose still would be 2 PTBB/100 hands. Still interested though in knwoing the total number of hands, if you don't mind.
|
|
#104
07-26-2006, 05:57 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Monster Penis Size
[ QUOTE ]
Ok. Sorry, I thought the result was in relation with your winrate, but after thinking about it a little more is not. ie. if the structure of the hands is more or less always the same the lose still would be 2 PTBB/100 hands. Still interested though in knwoing the total number of hands, if you don't mind. [/ QUOTE ] From the database you quoted: 8316 From the database below: 62579 3900 monster raked hands (5$+ pot) that I won. 1950$ monster load (3900 * 0.5$/hand) 62,579 hands total
|
|
#106
07-26-2006, 08:21 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Monster Penis Size
ok question, should I:
stay at NL 25 and 50 at party or go to stars or go to full tilt the stars tables seem tighter
|
|
#107
07-26-2006, 08:30 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Monster Penis Size
[ QUOTE ]
ok question, should I: stay at NL 25 and 50 at party or go to stars or go to full tilt the stars tables seem tighter [/ QUOTE ] If your level is 25 or 50, you are not relevant in this discussion.
|
|
#108
07-26-2006, 08:54 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Monster Penis Size
i am relevant because people who play nl100 may move down to avoid the rake increase.
|
|
#109
07-26-2006, 09:07 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
I <3 monster tables
Uh, no one should move down. And how is the title of this thing Penis Size? Please mod tera and tixmaster for their violations please.
After actually playing in the games, the monster tables are incredibly juicy. I played because of the BB jackpot getting so high, and to see how bad the competition really is. And it's baaaad. I now believe this 50 cents of extra rake is nothing in comparison to how easy some of these villains are to stack. It's basically a calling station city. Adjustments I made were that I started limping a few more medium-weak hands like AT (similar to Isura I think) and I stopped c-betting against certain people. While my estimations are clearly about the short-run, I'll probably be playing a lot during these few days where the tables really seem to be juicy. (I ran into a 90/20/1.2... who paid off 123 dollars into a 30 dollar pot!)
|
|
#110
07-26-2006, 09:12 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: I <3 monster tables
During my short session today between roughly 2am and 3am Pacific I didn't notice any more fish or any less TAGs than usual; of the 12 Monster $100 NL 6m tables I datamined before playing, I only thought about 7 of them were good enough to get on waitlists, and even one or two of those were just so-so (1 deepstacked LAGgy fish with 5 TAGs sitting around him, etc). Are you guys sure you aren't just imagining this? You can always find some retards at Party.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
