WSEX = RAKE FREE!

[d-baggery]

wow, they might go under. who cares. I am there to make money, not preserve their longevity in the market.

[edfurlong]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]


Also assuming a guy put in 5000 hands a month at .5/1, how much rake would one get back?

I would imagine an average rake of 20 cents per hand, so 5000 X 0.20 = $1000/10 players = 100 bucks back.

I think for a low limit bonus whore there are better opportunities out there.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think its more like 5 - 800 bucks.

[/ QUOTE ]

My .50/1.00 six max stats at party poker would put it a little over $150.

[Sponger.]

[ QUOTE ]
Meanwhile, they just threw buckets of bloody chum into the water with the No Rake deal. And as all the hard core players swarm into their poker site, all of the fish there get sucked dry and the tables turn to stone.

[/ QUOTE ]

Um, actually with no rake the fish are less likely to get sucked dry. Nice try though!

[Gildwulf]

[ QUOTE ]
Is there anyway you can open the client up twice on the same computer?

pls explain why you want to do this.

[/ QUOTE ]

OMG FAILED DICTATOR...IT WAS ALL A JOKE, LOL

you got me

[adi]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Is there anyway you can open the client up twice on the same computer?

pls explain why you want to do this.

[/ QUOTE ]



Just so i can play more than 3 tables, i emailed their support to increse my table numbers but they said three is the maximum.

So if i can open the client twice i can play 6 DIFFERENT tables, i am no cheat.

[/ QUOTE ]

mate, have you seen the client? they don't have 6 tables on the whole friggin site [img]/images/graemlins/shocked.gif[/img]

[celiboy]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]


Also assuming a guy put in 5000 hands a month at .5/1, how much rake would one get back?

I would imagine an average rake of 20 cents per hand, so 5000 X 0.20 = $1000/10 players = 100 bucks back.

I think for a low limit bonus whore there are better opportunities out there.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think its more like 5 - 800 bucks.

[/ QUOTE ]

Care to show your calculations? There is no way it would be that high at .5/1

I opened a few tables and it is a rock fest as far as I can gather. 20 hands in a row of under $5 pots.......

[sonartec]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Is there anyway you can open the client up twice on the same computer?

pls explain why you want to do this.

[/ QUOTE ]



Just so i can play more than 3 tables, i emailed their support to increse my table numbers but they said three is the maximum.

So if i can open the client twice i can play 6 DIFFERENT tables, i am no cheat.

[/ QUOTE ]

mate, have you seen the client? they don't have 6 tables on the whole friggin site [img]/images/graemlins/shocked.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

Actually i looked ATM there is two full ring $3/$6, 3 $2/$4 with over 6 players, a couple of $5/$10 games going and some NL, i could find 6 tables very easily.

[Alobar]

Why do people always look at it this way? "All the sharks are just gunna pass their stacks around when the fish dry up". "I dont wanna sit at a table full of rocks" Guess what, being a shark is a relative term. When I sit at a 1/2 table, Im a huge shark, when I sit at a 100/200 table im not. Table full or rocks or no, if you are the best player there, you are going to make money, if you arent the best player, you will lose money. And since the house isnt there taking money off the table, your profit will be based entirely on your edge against the other people at your table. I can see how this would be scary if you arent very good, but if you are good at poker (relative to your competition) then youll be ok. Maybe it will mean you have to drop a limit or something, but so what? Its all about the profit, if you can get more profit playing a higher limit with rake at another site that has fish, then go do so. But there will be plenty of people who will make more money at a rake free even if their edge over the competition is a little lower.

Also, the number of people on this forum that think 2+2 is read by only really good players is mind boggeling, do you ever read the stratedgy forums? This place is alive with fish, so yes, there are tens and tens of thousands of players who understand that rake is bad and who also suck at poker, so the potential is still large for a rake free site to be stocked full of fish. Look at how many millions of dollars a day party takes off the poker tables, now imagine what it would be like if those millions of dollars a day were kept in play.

[Gildwulf]

Table full or rocks or no, if you are the best player there, you are going to make money, if you arent the best player, you will lose money.

only true in a rake-free environment.

[playersare]

[ QUOTE ]
he posted a link. It was some quack whining on the forums at bonus whore. I love how playersare hyped up his reputation and then pasted that as his source, I thought that was funny as hell. does he go around saying party is rigged too, because some fish at one of his party tables told him it was, lol.

[/ QUOTE ]
the thread I posted was provided for the person who asked. S.E.'s initial comment was way off the mark and that response was not related to the other. at least there is some cerebral discussion on BW about the speculation, unlike numerous 'contributions' on this thread by OOT post-padding nits like yourself who didn't even know what WPEX was until 3 hours ago.

I have no financial or egotistical interest in whether anyone plays there or not, I'm just going by what I felt was worth putting out there. if you instead found it an opportunity to show off your ability to be both pompous and ignorant to me at the same time, by all means the kleenex and lubricant are right over there.