Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > High Stakes Limit
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #91  
Old 05-16-2007, 11:24 PM
Bluffman Bluffman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 329
Default Re: MONSTER variance (w/ graphs)

that graph yours kahntruhan?
Reply With Quote
  #92  
Old 05-16-2007, 11:58 PM
___1___ ___1___ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: __________
Posts: 1,296
Default Re: MONSTER variance (w/ graphs)

[ QUOTE ]
that graph yours kahntruhan?

[/ QUOTE ]

Pretty sure that's BK's.

___1___
Reply With Quote
  #93  
Old 05-17-2007, 04:24 AM
bicyclekick bicyclekick is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: waiting to ski
Posts: 5,286
Default Re: MONSTER variance (w/ graphs)

I don't think it's my graph and after further review I'm pretty sure my downswing was 1000bb.
Reply With Quote
  #94  
Old 05-17-2007, 07:23 AM
hoppscot22 hoppscot22 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: blogging
Posts: 1,041
Default Re: MONSTER variance (w/ graphs)

that looks like about a 1100-1200 bb dswing, sick
Reply With Quote
  #95  
Old 05-17-2007, 01:23 PM
kahntrutahn kahntrutahn is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Inundated with Idiocy
Posts: 1,080
Default Re: MONSTER variance (w/ graphs)

[ QUOTE ]
that graph yours kahntruhan?

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes, I own that graph of hell. And it was HELL.
Reply With Quote
  #96  
Old 05-17-2007, 01:24 PM
kahntrutahn kahntrutahn is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Inundated with Idiocy
Posts: 1,080
Default Re: MONSTER variance (w/ graphs)

[ QUOTE ]
schneids how often would you estimate you incur a 100bb downswing? once every x hands...

[/ QUOTE ]

I can't speak for schneids, but I have one every 3 days or so.
Reply With Quote
  #97  
Old 05-17-2007, 01:31 PM
Bluffman Bluffman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 329
Default Re: MONSTER variance (w/ graphs)

zomg, what this all at 50-100+ kahntrutahn?

if so, nooooooose!
Reply With Quote
  #98  
Old 05-17-2007, 02:14 PM
kahntrutahn kahntrutahn is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Inundated with Idiocy
Posts: 1,080
Default Re: MONSTER variance (w/ graphs)

[ QUOTE ]
zomg, what this all at 50-100+ kahntrutahn?

if so, nooooooose!

[/ QUOTE ]

Naa, its old. It was back when I 7 tabled 5/10, 4 tabled 10/20, or 3 tabled 20/40. Mostly a mix. But as I recall, I dropped to 3/6 and 2/4 and still got owned by the deck repeatedly. Basically, I lost 200+BB at every limit I played at the time.

I've never popped the -100k cherry. VERY close on multiple occasions (9x losses), but I dropped down and recovered just in time to save my sanity each time.
Reply With Quote
  #99  
Old 05-17-2007, 04:56 PM
AndyatSD AndyatSD is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 93
Default Re: MONSTER variance (w/ graphs)

(Disclaimer - I've never used a hand history converter so if this comes out weird oops)

Hock,

While I was at work today I was sent a number of hands that you played this morning. When I looked at it I thought of this thread - maybe this is the kind of style that increases the probability of a huge swing? I don't doubt that you're a winning player - but I'm just wondering what your rationale on some of these hands are. It certainly isn't pre-flop mathematics, but I find it hard to believe if you are doing this solely based on the fact that you believe you have a huge edge post-flop. Any comments on it?

Cold Cap 33 Preflop against UTG raiser and 2-hole 3 better? How can that possibly be?

PokerStars 100/200 Hold'em (5 handed) Hand History Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: 2+2 Forums)

Preflop:
<font color="#CC3333">UTG raises</font>, <font color="#CC3333">MP 3-bets</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Button :#A500AF(doughnutz)/ caps</font>, <font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, UTG calls, MP calls.

Flop: (13.50 SB) 8[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 2[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], 6[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font>
UTG checks, <font color="#CC3333">MP bets</font>, <font color="#CC3333">doughnutz raises</font>, UTG folds, <font color="#CC3333">MP 3-bets</font>, doughnutz calls.

Turn: (9.75 BB) 9[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
<font color="#CC3333">MP bets</font>, doughnutz calls.

River: (11.75 BB) J[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
MP checks, <font color="#CC3333">doughnutz bets</font>, MP calls.

Final Pot: 13.75 BB

Results in white below: <font color="#FFFFFF">
MP has Qc Qd (one pair, queens).
doughnutz has 3h 3d (flush, jack high).
Outcome: doughnutz wins 13.75 BB. </font>

---

Flop call is purely trying to make a move on the turn or river? If so, I didn't really see a move - and calling the flop based on mathematics would have been fairly atrocius.

PokerStars 100/200 Hold'em (5 handed) Hand History Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: 2+2 Forums)

Preflop:
<font color="#666666">3 folds</font>, <font color="#CC3333">SB :#A500AF(doughnutz)/ raises</font>, <font color="#CC3333">BB 3-bets</font>, SB :#A500AF(doughnutz)/ calls.

Flop: (6 SB) T[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 2[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], Q[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
doughnutz checks, <font color="#CC3333">BB bets</font>, doughnutz calls.

Turn: (4 BB) A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
doughnutz checks, <font color="#CC3333">BB bets</font>, doughnutz calls.

River: (6 BB) J[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
doughnutz checks, <font color="#CC3333">BB bets</font>, <font color="#CC3333">doughnutz raises</font>, BB calls.

Final Pot: 10 BB

Results in white below: <font color="#FFFFFF">
doughnutz has 3s 5s (flush, ace high).
BB has Ac Qs (two pair, aces and queens).
Outcome: doughnutz wins 10 BB. </font>
---

Is calling 2 more bets with Ax (where x=trash) the conventional norm now? I think the probability of running into bigger Ax or pocket pair bigger than X is just way too big - obviously you disagree since I saw multiple hand histories where you did this?

PokerStars 100/200 Hold'em (4 handed) Hand History Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: 2+2 Forums)

Preflop:
<font color="#CC3333">UTG raises</font>, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, <font color="#CC3333">SB 3-bets</font>, BB :#A500AF(doughnutz)/ calls, UTG calls.

Flop: (9 SB) 3[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], 2[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 7[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font>
<font color="#CC3333">SB bets</font>, <font color="#CC3333">doughnutz raises</font>, UTG folds, SB calls.

Turn: (6.50 BB) 3[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
SB checks, <font color="#CC3333">doughnutz bets</font>, <font color="#CC3333">SB raises</font>, <font color="#CC3333">doughnutz 3-bets</font>, SB calls.

River: (12.50 BB) 7[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
SB checks, <font color="#CC3333">doughnutz bets</font>, SB calls.

Final Pot: 14.50 BB

Results in white below: <font color="#FFFFFF">
SB has Jh Jc (two pair, jacks and sevens).
doughnutz has 3d Ac (full house, threes full of sevens).
Outcome: doughnutz wins 14.50 BB. </font>

---

On the other hand - while A2s isn't in my range of opening hands UTG I suppose it's fine if it's in yours - I'm just curious about the turn call. Can that really be profitable play? You already risk drawing dead or extremely slim?

PokerStars 100/200 Hold'em (6 handed) Hand History Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: 2+2 Forums)

Preflop:
<font color="#CC3333">UTG :#A500AF(doughnutz)/ raises</font>, <font color="#CC3333">MP 3-bets</font>, <font color="#666666">4 folds</font>, <font color="#CC3333">UTG :#A500AF(doughnutz)/ caps</font>, MP calls.

Flop: (9.50 SB) 7[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], 5[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], T[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
<font color="#CC3333">doughnutz bets</font>, MP calls.

Turn: (5.75 BB) 5[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
<font color="#CC3333">doughnutz bets</font>, <font color="#CC3333">MP raises</font>, doughnutz calls.

River: (9.75 BB) A[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
<font color="#CC3333">doughnutz bets</font>, MP calls.

Final Pot: 11.75 BB

Results in white below: <font color="#FFFFFF">
doughnutz has 2s As (two pair, aces and fives).
MP has Ks Kh (two pair, kings and fives).
Outcome: doughnutz wins 11.75 BB. </font>
---

I'm just very confused - maybe someone else can enlighten me - what's the merit behind these hands? I'd like to be able to add that to my game : )

~andy
Reply With Quote
  #100  
Old 05-17-2007, 05:19 PM
HOWMANY HOWMANY is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,322
Default Re: MONSTER variance (w/ graphs)

These all look like monkey tilt to me, which is probably why I'm so bad.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.