Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > 2+2 Communities > Other Other Topics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #91  
Old 03-21-2007, 09:47 PM
Patrick del Poker Grande Patrick del Poker Grande is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Sciencing Rockets
Posts: 9,999
Default Re: Grammar vs. Grammer

[ QUOTE ]
Please, add to this list... Sticky it... Next time somebody makes a 2nd grade English error, point them here...

[/ QUOTE ]
Point him here.
Reply With Quote
  #92  
Old 03-21-2007, 10:36 PM
punkass punkass is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: hip deep in pie
Posts: 4,695
Default Re: Grammar vs. Grammer

And how the hell do people confuse "by" and "buy"?
Reply With Quote
  #93  
Old 03-21-2007, 10:40 PM
daryn daryn is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Boston
Posts: 18,335
Default Re: Grammar vs. Grammer

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
fluffpop you're wrong about irregardless. it sucks but sometimes enough morons are incorrect that they change the rule. irregardless is a word.

[/ QUOTE ]

True, but it shouldn't be.

[/ QUOTE ]

ok.. so why say it isn't a word when you know it is?

[/ QUOTE ]
because it only became a word through widespread and consistent misuse?

edit: wait damn, fluffpop hadn't replied yet when i first started to make this post. now i look foolish

[/ QUOTE ]

who cares? i AGREE WITH YOU. if you read my earlier post you'd realize that. but it IS a word. to say it is not a word is incorrect.
Reply With Quote
  #94  
Old 03-21-2007, 10:51 PM
Kimbell175113 Kimbell175113 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: The art of losing isn\'t hard to master.
Posts: 2,464
Default Re: Grammar vs. Grammer

Hyachachachach we know exactly what you're saying, Daryn. "Irregardless" is a word, but it has the same meaning as - yet is strictly worse than - "regardless." Therefore, there is never a reason to use it, and therefore, when someone does, he defines himself as a moran. Can we agree on that?

I use "gonna" all the time. It's shorter, has a different feel, etc., than "going to." There are many examples of things like this, and I am perfectly fine with them. "Irregardless" has zero advantages to compensate for that extra syllable. In fact it has disadvantages. It are dumb, QED.

And yeah, I know you know.
Reply With Quote
  #95  
Old 03-21-2007, 10:54 PM
Deorum Deorum is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Northern California
Posts: 395
Default Re: Grammar vs. Grammer

I am a nit when it comes to grammar, but I usually do not say anything about it because it is generally not appreciated and just makes me look like an ass. However, since it is the topic of this thread, here are a few things that irritate me when I hear or read them. Some have been mentioned already but not explained (for the rare few who are reading this thread and are actually interested in improving their speech).

- For Christ's sake: The proper term is "for Christ's sake" not "for Christ sakes". The phrase "for Christ's sake" is posessive; it means for the sake of Christ. "For Christ sakes" is meaningless. Christ is not an adjective, and he only has one sake.

- Myself: Myself is a pronoun used as an intensive, as in "I did it myself" or as a reflexive, as in "I love myself". It can also be used to describe you as a state, as in "I was not myself last week". It cannot be used as a cute or intellectual replacement for "me" or "I", as in "Jessica went to the carnival with Greg, Joan, and myself".

- I could care less: The proper phrase is "I could not care less". To say "I could care less" means that you actually do care to some degree. Whenever somebody tells me, "I could care less" I always respond by asking, "How much less could you care?" Of course, they never get it.

- Affect/Effect: The common usage of the word "affect" is a verb. It means "to act on" or "to change". The common usage of the word "effect" is a noun. It means "result". Affect is also a noun, but it means "a feeling or emotion". Effect is also a verb, but it means "to bring about" or "to accomplish".

- Further/Farther: The difference between these two words is that something which is "farther" can be physically measured, while something that is "further" cannot. "I can hit a golf ball twenty yards farther than Steve can." "My psychologist thought we needed to delve further into my problem."

- Fewer/Less: Fewer refers to a smaller amount which can be physically counted. "I have two fewer dollars than Chris." Less refers to a smaller amount which cannot be physically counted. "I have less money than Chris."

- Ambivalence: Ambivalence is an inability to make up one's mind due to an equal desire for two conflicting things. It means to be torn between two decisions. It does not mean that one does not care about either decision. The word to describe that condition is "indifference."

- I got: Got is the past tense of the verb "to get". To get means to acquire or to receive. If you already have something, you cannot get it. Therefore, "I got five dollars" is incorrect. The correct sentence is "I have five dollars."

- Forte: The word is pronounced "fort" not "for-tay". For some reason, people get really defensive about this. They have always heard it pronounced "for-tay" and never "fort" so "for-tay" must be right. It is not. Forte' (pronounced "for-tay") is a word used in music to mean "play loudly". Forte (fort) is also commonly misused in definition. It means "strong point" or "that which somebody does best". It does not mean preference. "Bowling is not my forte" may be a true sentence, but if what you mean is you don't particularly care for bowling, then you used the word incorrectly. A better sentence would be, "Bowling is not my cup of tea".
Reply With Quote
  #96  
Old 03-21-2007, 11:05 PM
SoloAJ SoloAJ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Illinois State
Posts: 3,942
Default Re: Grammar vs. Grammer

"Therefore, "I got five dollars" is incorrect. "

Uhh, that sentence can make perfect sense. It just would not have the same meaning as "I have five dollars."

That forte thing is new to me (the pronunciation, not the meaning). I have never heard it misused in meaning.
Reply With Quote
  #97  
Old 03-21-2007, 11:09 PM
daryn daryn is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Boston
Posts: 18,335
Default Re: Grammar vs. Grammer

[ QUOTE ]
Hyachachachach we know exactly what you're saying, Daryn. "Irregardless" is a word, but it has the same meaning as - yet is strictly worse than - "regardless." Therefore, there is never a reason to use it, and therefore, when someone does, he defines himself as a moran. Can we agree on that?

I use "gonna" all the time. It's shorter, has a different feel, etc., than "going to." There are many examples of things like this, and I am perfectly fine with them. "Irregardless" has zero advantages to compensate for that extra syllable. In fact it has disadvantages. It are dumb, QED.

And yeah, I know you know.

[/ QUOTE ]




ok cool

is gonna a word? no

is irregardless a word? yes

i was just correcting an obvious error by fluff. when you come into this word and say [censored] like irregardless isn't a word you are gonna hear [censored] from me that's all baby.
Reply With Quote
  #98  
Old 03-21-2007, 11:12 PM
Kimbell175113 Kimbell175113 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: The art of losing isn\'t hard to master.
Posts: 2,464
Default Re: Grammar vs. Grammer

Yeah, you win.

Arguing is fun, though.
Reply With Quote
  #99  
Old 03-21-2007, 11:18 PM
Claunchy Claunchy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: smart HAG
Posts: 5,182
Default Re: Grammar vs. Grammer

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Please, add to this list... Sticky it... Next time somebody makes a 2nd grade English error, point them here...

[/ QUOTE ]
Point him here.

[/ QUOTE ]
DAMMIT I HATE YOU FOR BEATING ME TO THIS
Reply With Quote
  #100  
Old 03-21-2007, 11:23 PM
Deorum Deorum is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Northern California
Posts: 395
Default Re: Grammar vs. Grammer

[ QUOTE ]
"Therefore, "I got five dollars" is incorrect. "

Uhh, that sentence can make perfect sense. It just would not have the same meaning as "I have five dollars."


[/ QUOTE ]

Correct.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.