![]() |
|
#91
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
Do a search for RaiNKhAN on Pokerstars. He is currently 30 tabling the 16 turbos. He was in 4 of mine and I asked him about it. Saying he only uses one monitor as well. Anyone know him? [/ QUOTE ] Looks like someone is getting a Porsche this year!!! [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img] |
|
#92
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
We NEED this video. This guy is the multitable messiah. [/ QUOTE ] please, will someone do this. |
|
#93
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
This is exactly it. There is no way this guy could 30 table on party where the most recent action comes to the front and you lose the most urgent action... [/ QUOTE ] You misunderstand how he must be running things. Nothing comes to the front until you act on the current table. As soon as you click, another table will pop to the front -- the table with the least time left for an action. All the tables are in the same space on the screen. As long as he can read the table and act quickly, he can stay ahead of the countdown timer on all tables. The tables were he has no action never come up; that why, if he gets timed out on a particular table, it's hell to get back in that game -- trying to pull one table out of the mix is near impossible. It also explains how he can chat -- all the tables are stacked up in one spot. If he spots a table where it wants to chat, he drags that table off to the side. The one table off to the side will stay visible all the time, while the main stack of tables will still be constantly shuffling the most urgent action to the top whenever he clicks. He only needs enough space on his monitor for two tables to accomplish this. |
|
#94
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Do a search for RaiNKhAN on Pokerstars. He is currently 30 tabling the 16 turbos. He was in 4 of mine and I asked him about it. Saying he only uses one monitor as well. Anyone know him? [/ QUOTE ] Looks like someone is getting a Porsche this year!!! [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] and I doubt stars wanted the first car to go to a 10$ sng player [img]/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img] Maybe he should think about a monitor first.. |
|
#95
|
|||
|
|||
|
Wonder if it would it be easier to have 1 stack of 32 or 4 stacks of 8 windows.
|
|
#96
|
|||
|
|||
|
Provided that the tables don't jump in front of each other, i'd prefer a single stack of 32. There's no way you'd be following action on the other tables, so why not just stick with as clean an interface as possible? That'd also give you the opportunity to have the lobby in the background so you can join new tours.
|
|
#97
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] This is exactly it. There is no way this guy could 30 table on party where the most recent action comes to the front and you lose the most urgent action... [/ QUOTE ] You misunderstand how he must be running things. Nothing comes to the front until you act on the current table. As soon as you click, another table will pop to the front -- the table with the least time left for an action. All the tables are in the same space on the screen. As long as he can read the table and act quickly, he can stay ahead of the countdown timer on all tables. The tables were he has no action never come up; that why, if he gets timed out on a particular table, it's hell to get back in that game -- trying to pull one table out of the mix is near impossible. It also explains how he can chat -- all the tables are stacked up in one spot. If he spots a table where it wants to chat, he drags that table off to the side. The one table off to the side will stay visible all the time, while the main stack of tables will still be constantly shuffling the most urgent action to the top whenever he clicks. He only needs enough space on his monitor for two tables to accomplish this. [/ QUOTE ] I did understand... That's what I do myself & am able to play 20 SNGs on a small screen... I do it in a slightly more advanced way were I cascade the windows so that I can access any of them by click the bottom left corner of the window in case I time out... |
|
#98
|
|||
|
|||
|
I just played 12 on one screen, I don't see how he can do 30-40 although I do believe it. He's a BEAST!
|
|
#99
|
|||
|
|||
|
yeah I know... when I did 20 it felt like all I was doing was clicking all the time. I made so many mistakes as well... I still managed to make $60.
|
|
#100
|
|||
|
|||
|
I just played another set of 12, and I am really liking these. My ROI is at 30%, which I know I won't hold, but I can make $30 an hour at least. Thanks rainkhan for the idea!
|
![]() |
|
|