WPEX UPDATE IS HERE

[mpslg]

mrmeticulous seems to play mostly 2/4 limit. He always seems to be playing when I'm there, but I also seem to remember him saying he gets around $1000 per week in rakeback.

[Sully]

I have only been on WPEX for a little over a week, but I have to say it is great. I haven't been receiveing any rakeback since Empire ended, and it is a nice change.

My only complaint is that some of the higher-stakes shorthanded games seemed to play a bit strange. My sample size is way too small, and I want to stop short of crying collusion, but I plan to keep my eyes open. It may just be the result of a small pool of people who are aggressively exploiting eachother's tendencies.

That said, I am thrilled with this site in general. I honestly can't see what will stop them from getting 5 or 10 times the amount of players that they currently average. I have tested out the games at all levels, and they aren't nearly as tight as I had suspected.

I would recommend the site for all players, but for anyone who is playing 5/10 or below, you are missing out on a LOT of easy income if you are playing elsewhere.

Some bugs need to be fixed, but I personally haven't had nearly the problems that some other people seem to have had. I'll put up with a glitch here and there.

[thetruest]

[ QUOTE ]
cool so they made a pretty little interface and fix the no post blind bug that shouldnt happen anyway! Im so psyched for when they add 6 max, next year!!!

[/ QUOTE ]

shut up idiot.

Yes you do suck so much.

[thetruest]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Looks like they only fixed bugs because there are no major changes.
For example, there are still no NL SH tables.

I'll check back in a few weeks.

They have a good thing going and keep screwing around by losing people while they have the momentum.

[/ QUOTE ]

I will not play there until they get HU or 6 max NL tables.

[/ QUOTE ]

the funny part is you would prolly make more money anwyay with the amount of rake saved just playing regular full ring games.

[bills217]

[ QUOTE ]
So far, according to my e-mail records, WSEX has specifically promised me my tourney fees would be refunded on:

-April 17

-April 19

-April 25

-promised again on April 26 (date unknown)

-promised again on May 5 (date unknown), with their e-mail reply including the hilarious line, "We are a company of our word, we will make the payouts."

-promised again on June 6 (date unknown)

-June 30

Total, that's seven assurances from WSEX that my tourney fees will be refunded, four of them referring to the specific date they will be refunded on.

It is now July 5. WSEX is currently 0/7 with 4 strikeouts. How could anyone blame the fish for not wanting to play there?

[/ QUOTE ]

Add July 10 to that list, this time over the phone. I'm feeling less-than-confident.

Odds anyone?

[FULL RAKE]

"add 6-max tables" is a retarded request. Why would you prefer that over 5-max?

[Wilco666]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
So far, according to my e-mail records, WSEX has specifically promised me my tourney fees would be refunded on:

-April 17

-April 19

-April 25

-promised again on April 26 (date unknown)

-promised again on May 5 (date unknown), with their e-mail reply including the hilarious line, "We are a company of our word, we will make the payouts."

-promised again on June 6 (date unknown)

-June 30

Total, that's seven assurances from WSEX that my tourney fees will be refunded, four of them referring to the specific date they will be refunded on.

It is now July 5. WSEX is currently 0/7 with 4 strikeouts. How could anyone blame the fish for not wanting to play there?

[/ QUOTE ]

Add July 10 to that list, this time over the phone. I'm feeling less-than-confident.

Odds anyone?

[/ QUOTE ]

I bet for a crate of beer that I wil be doing a happy little sexy dance in front of my computer if I indeed find the tourney fees refunded to my account on July 10.

[bills217]

Do they have 5-max? If they do, I can't find them.

Look, WSEX has:

-no HH on hard drive
-comically bad support
-comically bad game selection
-comically bad software

Maybe these things will improve, but as of now, I can't blame anyone (especially a fish who needs to feel comfortable) for not playing there.

[Mitch Evans]

[ QUOTE ]
-no HH on hard drive
-comically bad support
-comically bad game selection
-comically bad software

Maybe these things will improve, but as of now, I can't blame anyone (especially a fish who needs to feel comfortable) for not playing there.



[/ QUOTE ]

Especially the fish? Really? I would think the things you listed would be more important to the sharks. Wouldn't it be nice to have a rake-free site that has the volume and support that Stars has? The fish would love it...

[thetruest]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
-no HH on hard drive
-comically bad support
-comically bad game selection
-comically bad software

Maybe these things will improve, but as of now, I can't blame anyone (especially a fish who needs to feel comfortable) for not playing there.



[/ QUOTE ]

Especially the fish? Really? I would think the things you listed would be more important to the sharks. Wouldn't it be nice to have a rake-free site that has the volume and support that Stars has? The fish would love it...

[/ QUOTE ]


Although i'm not sure what he means by "volume" as it pertains to pstars, Mitch is completely right. All those things you listed, except game selection (just shorthanded NL), are important to the sharks, Not the fish.