*Official* WCOOP Event #5 530 NL Holdem - Page 70

cardcore · #**691** 09-17-2007, 11:43 AM

isnt this deal good for me? I have no clue?!

Body Man D · #**692** 09-17-2007, 11:43 AM

gl takt, very well played. Now go get that 150k.

Dunkman · #**693** 09-17-2007, 11:44 AM

120 BBs v. 80 BBs HU, so sick, GL!

lusciouscat · #**694** 09-17-2007, 11:44 AM

GOGOGOGOGO seb GOGOGOGOGO

Melchiades · #**695** 09-17-2007, 11:45 AM

[ QUOTE ]
isnt this deal good for me? I have no clue?!

[/ QUOTE ]
The deal was pefectly fine for both. I was talking about the guy above me who thought an even split would be good for both.

Not much of a "deal" when you have to leave 150k on the table though. GL.

diggla · #**696** 09-17-2007, 11:45 AM

good deal, now go win the HU seb [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]

yteba · #**697** 09-17-2007, 11:46 AM

[ QUOTE ]
the 150k thing is retarded; there's no deal to be made

[/ QUOTE ]
Yeah the 5% should be 5% of REMAINING pricepool.

Ontario_Tory · #**698** 09-17-2007, 11:46 AM

[ QUOTE ]
Why the hell is it a good idea for tak to give away money? Where is the upside?

[/ QUOTE ]

Being results oriented, obv it was a bad plan, as illusive folded.

But had he pushed to play, giving up 6k of the deal money to secure 25k more than 2nd, with the 150k on the table, would have been OK, imho.

I don't believe that either of these players have a HUGE edge on each other, so making the even chop (with 150k behind) would have been OK...

OT

UMTerp · #**699** 09-17-2007, 11:47 AM

That 5% rule is pretty dumb. 2 or 3% would still serve the purpose, and give the players more flexibility with a deal, no?

Dunkman · #**700** 09-17-2007, 11:47 AM

Tak over 2:1 CL now, gogogo!