|
|
|
|
#1
09-05-2007, 09:29 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Set over set
You have to try to see those things independent from their results. Of course you'll lose in set over set situations every now and then but in general and in the long term, playing for stacks in these situations is +EV.
|
|
#2
09-05-2007, 09:36 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Set over set
our odds of hitting a set
1/7.5 our neighbors odds of hitting a set 1/7.5. So, my estimate is that set over set should occur about 1 in 56.25 times you get one? I know the math could be taken to a much higher level, but is this completely wrong from a statistics stand point? I need to ask this in the probabilities section and see what those booger eaters say.
|
|
#3
09-05-2007, 04:53 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Set over set
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Set over set is a cooler in this situation. Villain will have all sorts of two pair hands. [/ QUOTE ] He had set. [/ QUOTE ] haha
|
|
#4
09-05-2007, 02:35 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Set over set
Never in a raised pot. The hand you posted would always get it in if I had it. In a limped pot with bottom set on a 348 I could possibly see a fold.
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
