|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: You order a mixed drink that costs between $8-12 - you tip? | |||
| $1 |
   
|
114 | 64.41% |
| $2 |
  
|
58 | 32.77% |
| $3+ |
  
|
5 | 2.82% |
| Voters: 177. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
09-14-2007, 10:16 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: *** Official Fantasy Football Start\'em/Sit\'em Thread: SEPT ***
Who Do I Start, Pick 3.
And also long term, do you guys prefer Josh Brown or Neil Rackers in a league that rewards long FGs. 
|
|
#3
09-14-2007, 11:01 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: *** Official Fantasy Football Start\'em/Sit\'em Thread: SEPT ***
Also all these pages into this, who are all these people that like Maroney vs SD ? Honestly he's going to lay a goose egg. Brady throws 40+ times, I guarantee that.
|
|
#4
09-14-2007, 12:05 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: *** Official Fantasy Football Start\'em/Sit\'em Thread: SEPT ***
Yeah, I'm going with Big ben. Miami's pass d is just too tough, and I can't pass up the Steelers O against buffalo.
Ok here's two more questions:
|
|
#6
09-14-2007, 01:46 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: *** Official Fantasy Football Start\'em/Sit\'em Thread: SEPT ***
[ QUOTE ]
Yeah, I'm going with Big ben. Miami's pass d is just too tough, and I can't pass up the Steelers O against buffalo. [/ QUOTE ] Miami's pass d is tough?
|
|
#8
09-14-2007, 05:50 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: *** Official Fantasy Football Start\'em/Sit\'em Thread: SEPT ***
|
|
#9
09-14-2007, 06:05 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: *** Official Fantasy Football Start\'em/Sit\'em Thread: SEPT ***
Rivers should obviously fare better than he did against Chicago, but Dallas' secondary look ripe.
|
|
#10
09-14-2007, 06:07 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: *** Official Fantasy Football Start\'em/Sit\'em Thread: SEPT ***
I have the same problem dusty. I'm sticking with rivers
|
|
|
|
Hybrid Mode
