|
|
|
|
#1
03-21-2006, 01:38 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PM possibly relevant to others so posted here
Neither of these options should make any difference to your problem, but I will explain them anyway:
The option -s just makes v0.02 of FPHG go into silent mode (ie: is doesn't display anything while it's running if you use this option). The option -d is just used to give a larger delay between consecutive memory scans. The only reason of the using the option -d is if you want to allocate more or less processor time to FPHG. Unless your system is under extreme load, then the -d option isn't necessary. Juk [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] 
|
|
#2
06-01-2006, 02:13 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: PM possibly relevant to others so posted here
Just wanted to say this is a kewl little app, have just discovered it, I'm also a programmer and a poker player and it's kewl to see someone doing this kind of stuff, makes me realise I should be more active on this forum from now on, there's so much info here - wish I had more time.
Anyway thanks Juk great work.
|
|
#3
03-20-2006, 08:27 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: FPHG v0.01 available
If I have the hand grabber running while i'm also sitting at some of my tables will it screw up the tables i'm sitting at by importing the file twice or will pt be able to tell its the same hh file and ignore one?
|
|
#4
03-21-2006, 10:07 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: FPHG v0.01 available
[ QUOTE ]
If I have the hand grabber running while i'm also sitting at some of my tables will it screw up the tables i'm sitting at by importing the file twice or will pt be able to tell its the same hh file and ignore one? [/ QUOTE ] No I don't think so (Discussed here allready). Juk [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
|
|
#6
03-21-2006, 10:36 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: FPHG v0.01 available
[ QUOTE ]
Can you elaborate on why dual processor machines may have issues? [/ QUOTE ] I am not sure if they do make any difference (just trying to get to the bottom of why it wont work for these two people), but I have a distant memory of reading some code which used the same process/API calls as I used to grab the hands (but in the context of game trainers which also write to memory), and it had to have some additional code adding for dual processor machines (possibly semaphores for locked memory? - long time since I read this). [ QUOTE ] I would assume this would apply to dual core and hyperthreaded processers also? [/ QUOTE ] Yes, if it were an issue then it would effect these two (I meant dual core/dual processor to mean the same... [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] ). Juk [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
|
|
#9
03-22-2006, 10:51 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
A suggestion
First I just want to say Great work! Really awesome! I am forever grateful.
If I would make a wish for the next version it would be that it was possible to minimize it to system tray. Again, thanks!
|
|
#10
03-22-2006, 04:11 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: A suggestion
[ QUOTE ]
If I would make a wish for the next version it would be that it was possible to minimize it to system tray. [/ QUOTE ] Yes, I agree fully that it would be much better if the application itself would minimise to the system tray (one day I will fix this up for all my applications, as they all should really minimise to the system tray, but just not had time to do it for them yet). One thing you could try until then is to look for an application called "Tray-it", as this will let you minimise <u>any</u> application to the system tray (I use this all the time to minimise things like media player, etc to the system tray). [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] Juk [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
