Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Politics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old 04-12-2007, 06:07 AM
NewTeaBag NewTeaBag is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Phuket, Thailand
Posts: 2,085
Default Re: Two points against Intellectual property laws

For the music industry I'm not so concerned about IP.

For those adding "concrete value" to society, i.e. scientists and engineers IP becomes a much HUGER concern. Drug companies invest massive (Bilions upon billions) in nw drug research much of which is committed to improving society. Now of course they are doing this for mostly commercial reasons (big payoff of overcharging on patented drugs) but in this case the commercial reasons tend to align with positve social benefits. I don't see why or even fiscally how, this research could carry on if the $Bs invested were instantly lost due to loose IP.

Also, from the "arts" side, literature would seem to require far stricter IP. It matters not if you still have "the idea" if someone has reproduced your work then made it to publisher/market prior to you. They reap all the rewards and you certainly would be far less motivated to produce more "art."
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:48 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.