What grammatical errors really piss you off? - Page 2

grando · #1 02-04-2007, 08:09 AM

[ QUOTE ]

"should of"

[/ QUOTE ]

yep

holdme · #2 02-04-2007, 08:34 AM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

"should of"

[/ QUOTE ]

yep

[/ QUOTE ]
I don't like "to who" either. It sounds so...ugly.

CaseS87 · #3 02-04-2007, 08:39 AM

Oh, also people who say "for all intensive purposes."

Wools · #4 02-04-2007, 08:50 AM

Shouldn't title read "Which grammatical..."

Hume · #5 02-04-2007, 09:49 AM

[ QUOTE ]
Shouldn't title read "Which grammatical..."

[/ QUOTE ]

What it do?

prodonkey · #6 02-04-2007, 10:13 AM

Loose and lose

ChrisV · #7 02-04-2007, 10:38 AM

[ QUOTE ]
Oh, also people who say "for all intensive purposes."

[/ QUOTE ]

QFT

I find misuses of you're/your and their/they're/there irritating. It's jarring to read, sometimes i have to reread the sentence to make sense of it.

samsdmf · #8 02-04-2007, 10:40 AM

Not a grammatical error but people (on THIS site) who say ftw, ergh.

ChrisV · #9 02-04-2007, 10:40 AM

Oh, and people who think "alot" is a word.

rageotones · #10 02-05-2007, 07:47 PM

[ QUOTE ]
Oh, and people who think "alot" is a word.

[/ QUOTE ]