Party Football Promo - Week #6

[S&SGW]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Has anyones results page updated?

[/ QUOTE ]

No, still showing only the first 3 weeks for me...

As I mentioned in one of the earlier threads, it's nice they posted some of the results, but what are the chances this gets updated before the promotion is over?

[/ QUOTE ]

About the same as me getting 5 for 5 [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]

So far I only have 2 $50 wins, the rest come in at 3 for 5.
Thanks for all the info, I still don't know who to pick, lol!


-S&SGW

[Schwartzy61]

I posted all the information, read all the information, and still don't know who to pick. I just went with the favorite, those sportsbooks know a heckuva lot more than I do...

[pipster]

Didn't Chris Simms win his playoff game w/ Tampa Bay against a more experienced quarterback? That was the only young QB which looked good... Well Carson Palmer for his 1 play but that doesn't count. Eli Manning looked horrid.

[ QUOTE ]
This is probably the worst game to have to pick. It all depends on which Carolina team shows up. The team that dominated the last two weeks over relatively good opponents. Or the team that has lost to Miami and New Orleans and barely scraped out wins against Green Bay and Detroit.

There's also the experienced QB vs. First-time playoff QB which last week was a sweep for the experienced QBs. This is a tough one...

[/ QUOTE ]

[Schwartzy61]

Uh the Redskins won dude. You could say Simms looked far, far better than Brunell, but my point was the team with the playoff experienced QB won all 4 games last week...

[radii]

2: Carolina will have greater than or equal to 225 overall passing yards?
a) : Yes
b) : No



Carolina averaged 204 passing yards per game this season, Chicago has allowed 171 per game. Carolina passed for 186 in the first meeting. Fairly easy NO answer.

[pipster]

DUH! Yeah you are right... experienced QB = good times. Of course with Chicago their QB doesn't do anything anyways. Runs 3 plays and gives it back to their defense. Did I hear right that the chicago Defense has outscored the chicago Offense?

[ QUOTE ]
Uh the Redskins won dude. You could say Simms looked far, far better than Brunell, but my point was the team with the playoff experienced QB won all 4 games last week...

[/ QUOTE ]

[AngusThermopyle]

[ QUOTE ]
Did I hear right that the chicago Defense has outscored the chicago Offense?


[/ QUOTE ]

Defense/special Teams TD's: 6
Offense TD's: 22 (11 rush & 11 pass)

Even throwing in the fact that 3 or 4 of the "offensive" TD's were on "drives" of less than 15 yds (ie set up by the Defense) so you might view the numbers as 18 and 10, the Bear's Offense did outscore the Defense.

[AngusThermopyle]

Also, weather dot com says Sunday in Chicago:

"Mix of sun and clouds. Highs in the low 40s and lows in the upper 30s."

[Schwartzy61]

Today's question..

3: The Chicago defense will record greater than or equal to three (3) quarterback sacks?
a) : Yes
b) : No

[mosuavea]

[ QUOTE ]
Today's question..

3: The Chicago defense will record greater than or equal to three (3) quarterback sacks?
a) : Yes
b) : No

[/ QUOTE ]

I would say yes but what do I know