Poker Iq test

[helgefyll]

I stumbled over this test, and just wondered if ppl here have tried it?

Spam link removed

It says it's developed by professionals, anyone know if this is a fact, if so who?
I felt u got to little info to make accurate decisions..
Anyway, figured I would post it, would be fun to see what good players get on this test.

[canvasbck]

109, but I rushed through it. Not enough info on a lot of the questions. I did confirm that I suck at playing big pairs and do well with positional play.

[Fiksdal]

I got 116.. In some of the questions there could be several good answers though.. so that's wierd.

[anotherFliplost]

111, and I have no idea why. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] I hope the e-mail 'splains some of the answers.

[A10Chief]

112...I think they should have included some info on your image and some other stuff, but overall pretty cool.

[Mr.Poker]

120...seems a bit flawed though as some useful info is missing from some hands + hands are taken in a vaccum. Quite like the analysis bit after the test though, quite interesting. (also, never played cash games so quite tough to answer some qs)

[Jamma]

115


but so many questions were asked in a way that they basically told you the answear is to be a tight nit..

[Valsuvious]

89. Obviously my knowledge is as bad as I thought that it was =p

[seke2]

118...rushed through it and had to walk away from my desk during the middle of it, so if the timer impacted your score, that probably didn't help me. Definitely some flaws and I'm pretty sure the guy who wrote it doesn't understand poker well enough to ask questions properly. And not being a cash game player probably hurt my ability to answer some of those questions.

[Rocco]

120... I'm too a bit crappy on cash games, so that probably lowers my score. I have a feeling that the answers the constructor thinks is right probably differs from what 2+2ers would see correct. A lot of the questions lacked enough information as previously stated.