Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Mid-High Stakes Shorthanded

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-23-2006, 04:37 PM
Jeffage Jeffage is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 7,171
Default Possibly Interesting

20-40 six handed. I have K [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]Q [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] in the SB. Tight player (bordering on a bit weak postflop, misses some bets, predictable, etc) opens in cutoff, fold to me and I raise it again. BB drops, now tight player caps. I call.

Flop comes A [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]4 [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]2 [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]. I check, cutoff bets and I call. The turn comes the 7 [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]. I check, cutoff checks. The river is the 8 [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]. I...

Thoughts on all streets appreciated.

Jeff
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-23-2006, 04:42 PM
ILOVEPOKER929 ILOVEPOKER929 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Omaha Fish
Posts: 5,114
Default Re: Possibly Interesting

I would fold the flop but whatever. As far as the river play, I would check/fold. When a tight player checks that turn after the preflop+flop action, it is becuz he is showing down, not giving up.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-23-2006, 04:44 PM
admiralfluff admiralfluff is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,742
Default Re: Possibly Interesting

By "tight player" I'm assuming we have the best hand never here, right?

He's checking the turn because he wants to get to SD with his underpair. You might be able to steal this pot from him with a c/r, but I don't think it works near often enough.

I would fold the flop in a heartbeat.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-23-2006, 05:59 PM
Magikist Magikist is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 247
Default Re: Possibly Interesting

[ QUOTE ]
it is becuz he is showing down, not giving up.

[/ QUOTE ]

Really?

Because maybe why OP thought this hand might be interesting is because A) the "bluff call" on the flop w. KQ when he sometimes has 6 outs and will get a free river often against this type of opponent, and B) a possible river bluff (lead) aren't so bad as they originally appear?

Mainly focusing on B), any reasonably decent player recognizes that this action by the TAG is a defensive showdown move with a pocket pair. So, theoretically, if everyone knows that this opponent is calling a river bet 100% of the time, players are only value betting aces or high pocket pairs. And this pattern in my experience has seemed to hold true almost invariably. When I'm the preflop capper in this situation, I'm almost always beat when I call, and when I'm ahead my opponent almost always checks.

So - shouldn't hands like 99-22 start folding rivers like this? I have done it against opponents I consider "predictable" or "straightforward." I guess it just depends on the stupidity factor - is the opponent "stupid" enough to make a completely "hopeless" river bluff? Of course, this line of thinking by tight TAGs coupled with the fact that you need to be successful 20% of the time to show a profit makes this hopeless river bluff - and the flop call to get the river - look a lot more reasonable than at first glance.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-23-2006, 07:10 PM
Surf Surf is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Blogging
Posts: 5,619
Default Re: Possibly Interesting

[ QUOTE ]
So, theoretically, if everyone knows that this opponent is calling a river bet 100% of the time, players are only value betting aces or high pocket pairs. And this pattern in my experience has seemed to hold true almost invariably. When I'm the preflop capper in this situation, I'm almost always beat when I call, and when I'm ahead my opponent almost always checks.

So - shouldn't hands like 99-22 start folding rivers like this? I have done it against opponents I consider "predictable" or "straightforward." I guess it just depends on the stupidity factor - is the opponent "stupid" enough to make a completely "hopeless" river bluff? Of course, this line of thinking by tight TAGs coupled with the fact that you need to be successful 20% of the time to show a profit makes this hopeless river bluff - and the flop call to get the river - look a lot more reasonable than at first glance.

[/ QUOTE ]

Magi,

I think you are giving this tight/predictable player a bit too much credit for levels of thinking. He's not checking behind 99 and then facing a river bet, then thinking "i checked to save myself a bet, and he knows i checked to save myself a bet, so if he bets he's betting for value so i should fold." He's just thinking "yay i saved myself a bet, i hope he's bluffing missed spades or a lower underpair."

Also, I don't think a tight/predictable player caps below TT or 99 with any regularity, though you may have just been making that point for the sake of argument, which is probably accurate that against good players we should be folding some of the time since they expect us to call.

As played i'd fold the folp, and check the river, since I don't think villain's folding to our river bet very often, pretty much just the same % of times as he got way out of line with his PF cap.

Surf
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-23-2006, 07:18 PM
Jstyal Jstyal is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bad Beat Central, Inc. A Division of Suckout Corp.
Posts: 312
Default Re: Possibly Interesting

edit below
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-23-2006, 07:19 PM
Jstyal Jstyal is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bad Beat Central, Inc. A Division of Suckout Corp.
Posts: 312
Default Re: Possibly Interesting

[ QUOTE ]
Easy check/fold. This guy either checked behind a monster on the turn or pussed out with the Ace and is now trying to sd his underpair cheaply. A river c/r is viable here with the right villain though (which only you can know the guesstimates of it succeeding vs specific opponents).

[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-23-2006, 07:47 PM
Paluka Paluka is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: New York
Posts: 5,114
Default Re: Possibly Interesting

If you were going to make a play at this flop, it has to be a flop checkraise. Once he checks behind on the turn you have to give up.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-24-2006, 10:09 AM
Jeffage Jeffage is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 7,171
Default Re: Possibly Interesting

Do you disagree with the flop call?

Jeff
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-24-2006, 10:12 AM
Paluka Paluka is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: New York
Posts: 5,114
Default Re: Possibly Interesting

[ QUOTE ]
Do you disagree with the flop call?

Jeff

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes. I think you should be checkraising, donking or folding. All are preferable to check/call.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.