![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Perhaps I'm being childish [/ QUOTE ] yes, i agree. PS: This is the type of tip[ping thread which we wont allow. Your free to make your own decisions here, its not cool to ask B&m their opinion if you already decided not to tip. [/ QUOTE ] woops, I forgot to lock it before. Oh well, too late. thread lives! |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Negligence action requires proof of:
1) existence of duty 2) breach of duty 3) causation 4) damages 1) Does the dealer have a duty to deal properly, yes. 2) Did he breach that duty? yes 3) Did his breach of duty cause you harm. This is not as clear cut based on the circumstances and you can certainly make the argument either way. 4)Was their damage? yea $1800. ... So think you should sue if feel so deprived. I think you are being irrational because poker is a game of risks. Unlike other games you can make all the right moves and still lose, this is an example of that. The dealer gave you a bad beat of sorts. Do you also not tip when a dealer burns and turns a card that lets your opponents draw get there? Cause its really the same thing. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|