|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Who wins the 2006 Sports Illustrated Sportsman of the Year Award? | |||
| Billy Donovan |
   
|
1 | 1.67% |
| Vince Young |
  
|
2 | 3.33% |
| Italy's WC Team |
  
|
1 | 1.67% |
| Bill Cowher |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| Roger Federer |
  
|
11 | 18.33% |
| Dwayne Wade |
  
|
5 | 8.33% |
| Tony La Russa |
|
1 | 1.67% |
| Paul Tagliabue |
|
2 | 3.33% |
| George Mason men's bb team |
|
4 | 6.67% |
| Tiger Woods |
|
28 | 46.67% |
| "Game of Shadows" writers |
|
3 | 5.00% |
| Other |
|
2 | 3.33% |
| Voters: 60. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
11-26-2007, 09:02 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Any Full Tilt regulars on here? NL 200 and NL 100
[ QUOTE ]
Its not a lose-lose if you are willing to go one step beyond your opponent. If you both exert the same pressure on each other then yes it will be a wild rollercoaster ride but if you are willing to push just a little harder then you will profit in the long run. (Edit: There will be a lot of variance in the middle but that is why we have big BRs amirite?) [/ QUOTE ] Yes- you will profit in the reg Vs reg battles IF you're good enough and prepared to put in the time and effort, but at what greater expense? I suspect most of the regs who like to get over-involved with other regs may show a profit in those battles, but overall their win-rate is lower than the more sensible regs. 
|
|
#2
11-27-2007, 04:11 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Any Full Tilt regulars on here? NL 200 and NL 100
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Its not a lose-lose if you are willing to go one step beyond your opponent. If you both exert the same pressure on each other then yes it will be a wild rollercoaster ride but if you are willing to push just a little harder then you will profit in the long run. (Edit: There will be a lot of variance in the middle but that is why we have big BRs amirite?) [/ QUOTE ] Yes- you will profit in the reg Vs reg battles IF you're good enough and prepared to put in the time and effort, but at what greater expense? I suspect most of the regs who like to get over-involved with other regs may show a profit in those battles, but overall their win-rate is lower than the more sensible regs. [/ QUOTE ] Narena, not everyone can play during the EST night shift where you can play 20/6 and kill it. I mean no offense to you personally at all but for people that have to play during the day the games are very different. I know because I have played a few night shifts when I manage to stay up late and I find myself with no regs and playing close to your style...
|
|
#3
11-27-2007, 04:35 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Any Full Tilt regulars on here? NL 200 and NL 100
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Its not a lose-lose if you are willing to go one step beyond your opponent. If you both exert the same pressure on each other then yes it will be a wild rollercoaster ride but if you are willing to push just a little harder then you will profit in the long run. (Edit: There will be a lot of variance in the middle but that is why we have big BRs amirite?) [/ QUOTE ] Yes- you will profit in the reg Vs reg battles IF you're good enough and prepared to put in the time and effort, but at what greater expense? I suspect most of the regs who like to get over-involved with other regs may show a profit in those battles, but overall their win-rate is lower than the more sensible regs. [/ QUOTE ] Narena, not everyone can play during the EST night shift where you can play 20/6 and kill it. I mean no offense to you personally at all but for people that have to play during the day the games are very different. I know because I have played a few night shifts when I manage to stay up late and I find myself with no regs and playing close to your style... [/ QUOTE ] Yes, good point. (I took no offense by the way!! [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] )
|
|
#4
11-27-2007, 05:59 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Any Full Tilt regulars on here? NL 200 and NL 100
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Its not a lose-lose if you are willing to go one step beyond your opponent. If you both exert the same pressure on each other then yes it will be a wild rollercoaster ride but if you are willing to push just a little harder then you will profit in the long run. (Edit: There will be a lot of variance in the middle but that is why we have big BRs amirite?) [/ QUOTE ] Yes- you will profit in the reg Vs reg battles IF you're good enough and prepared to put in the time and effort, but at what greater expense? I suspect most of the regs who like to get over-involved with other regs may show a profit in those battles, but overall their win-rate is lower than the more sensible regs. [/ QUOTE ] no, especially if they play taggish. DUCY?
|
|
#5
11-27-2007, 11:13 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Any Full Tilt regulars on here? NL 200 and NL 100
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Its not a lose-lose if you are willing to go one step beyond your opponent. If you both exert the same pressure on each other then yes it will be a wild rollercoaster ride but if you are willing to push just a little harder then you will profit in the long run. (Edit: There will be a lot of variance in the middle but that is why we have big BRs amirite?) [/ QUOTE ] Yes- you will profit in the reg Vs reg battles IF you're good enough and prepared to put in the time and effort, but at what greater expense? I suspect most of the regs who like to get over-involved with other regs may show a profit in those battles, but overall their win-rate is lower than the more sensible regs. [/ QUOTE ] no, especially if they play taggish. DUCY? [/ QUOTE ] Well, according to a now near-1,000,000 hand sample of $1/2 it appears to be true of the Full Tilt tables. (I posted a 800k sample of the biggest winners a short while ago on this thread- as Acevadar mentioned above.) You play 1000NL right? There is clearly such a vast difference in the make-up of the table in terms of players' ability and experience that optimal strategy between these stakes must differ immensely.
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
