![]() |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Who wins the 2006 Sports Illustrated Sportsman of the Year Award? | |||
| Billy Donovan |
|
1 | 1.67% |
| Vince Young |
|
2 | 3.33% |
| Italy's WC Team |
|
1 | 1.67% |
| Bill Cowher |
|
0 | 0% |
| Roger Federer |
|
11 | 18.33% |
| Dwayne Wade |
|
5 | 8.33% |
| Tony La Russa |
|
1 | 1.67% |
| Paul Tagliabue |
|
2 | 3.33% |
| George Mason men's bb team |
|
4 | 6.67% |
| Tiger Woods |
|
28 | 46.67% |
| "Game of Shadows" writers |
|
3 | 5.00% |
| Other |
|
2 | 3.33% |
| Voters: 60. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
Acevader has made some good posts recently on the topic of "Regular-on-Regular Action." [/ QUOTE ] It seems to me that the regs at NL200 don't attack each other as much as they do at NL100. Because of that, I've laid off from attacking the regs because they aren't playing back at me as much, and usually give them credit for a hand when they do. The exception to this so far is Bigkawik, who's I've stacked 3 times catching him 3-betting me as weak as A,10os. I agree with your analysis Smart Money, and feel that because lately it seems there are more regs at the table than fish, in order to be more profitable maybe we will have to play back at each other more often. Analyzing the regs game and exploiting holes is something that will only make us better poker players, and when we make the step up to 2/4 and beyond it will definitely be something we have to adapt to. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yes, absolutely.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Was anybody mining 1/2 NLHE table Anthem Club today? 99maxima is sitting on a $3,130 stack...just wondering how long it took him to accumulate 15.5 buyins 1 tabling
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
i have him playing 27/5 after 100 hands on that table, up $222. Sadly wasn't mining earlier.
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Vizer02, it's funny you say that; my brother is a NL$100 regular on Full Tilt and he's been saying that there is a lot of 3-betting, raising and check-raising from the other regulars. Sounds like they really go at each other down there.
Again I come back to my point.....what is the point? Smart Money is making money, raylapsley is making money, I'm making money, fittsmurf ([censored]) is making money, gabygaby is making money, etc, etc, etc. There is plenty to go around such that there isn't a need to get into massive personal battles. If I start getting into regular wars with other regs whereby we are constantly probing each other for weaknesses I'll have to reduce my table number. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
Vizer02, it's funny you say that; my brother is a NL$100 regular on Full Tilt and he's been saying that there is a lot of 3-betting, raising and check-raising from the other regulars. Sounds like they really go at each other down there. Again I come back to my point.....what is the point? Smart Money is making money, raylapsley is making money, I'm making money, fittsmurf ([censored]) is making money, gabygaby is making money, etc, etc, etc. There is plenty to go around such that there isn't a need to get into massive personal battles. If I start getting into regular wars with other regs whereby we are constantly probing each other for weaknesses I'll have to reduce my table number. [/ QUOTE ] The point is that people have egos, and it's stupid. FWIW, this is the reason that I keep my screen name secret...too many people want to just outplay the regs every hand, and it's dumb. Focus on the fish, and focus on money. This game has nothing to do with ego/being the best and everything to do with profit. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Agree. Smart Money hit the nail so hard and squarely on the head when he said that he's there to make money not to be the best player. I couldn't care if everyone in the world thought I was the worst poker player alive if I made legitimate money over a sample that means it isn't luck.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|