|
|
|
|
#1
11-18-2007, 05:00 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: testing the rake at .25-.50 limit on FTP.
Well, first off, last time I checked the rake at .25/.5 on full tilt amounted to about 2.5bb/100. That's an awful lot to overcome. I assume you're talking about texas holdem although you don't say. I think that other games are probably more beatable than holdem, because people are much more awful at them. In particular I'm thinking stud/8, omaha/8 or stud hi. I tried to beat .25/.5 razz and couldn't do it over about 10k hands, although I was beating it for an awful long time. I ended up at about -.5bb/100 (which means pre-rake I was making 3bb/100, not bad)
I'd love to see if someone could beat it for 50k hands. 
|
|
#2
11-19-2007, 03:38 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: testing the rake at .25-.50 limit on FTP.
Beating 6 max .25/.50 pretty easily and I only play half of the hands at a site with rakeback. Sample size is only about 10k so I still have a giant ways to go till 50k, and could just and probably is variance. Might help you a bit though. About 3.5bb/100.
|
|
#3
11-19-2007, 09:57 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: testing the rake at .25-.50 limit on FTP.
[ QUOTE ]
Beating 6 max .25/.50 pretty easily and I only play half of the hands at a site with rakeback. Sample size is only about 10k so I still have a giant ways to go till 50k, and could just and probably is variance. Might help you a bit though. About 3.5bb/100. [/ QUOTE ]
|
|
#5
11-19-2007, 09:39 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: testing the rake at .25-.50 limit on FTP.
[ QUOTE ]
Care to add anything? [/ QUOTE ] Small sample size on this guy but I'm hoping he gets banned real hard for that quote crap.
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
