skier well

[_dave_]

[ QUOTE ]

they're not nearly that important and vary greatly depending on how you play.


[/ QUOTE ]

Yes, but down here we wonder how winning MS/HSNLers play [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

At least I guess thid is the reason for these stat enquiries... people are wanting a general impression of how you play, not a magical stat to reach for, imo.

Hopefully will be a great well.. please keep it open for several days as Metetron did.

TY for doing this, Skier_5.

[skier_5]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

they're not nearly that important and vary greatly depending on how you play.


[/ QUOTE ]

Yes, but down here we wonder how winning MS/HSNLers play [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

At least I guess thid is the reason for these stat enquiries... people are wanting a general impression of how you play, not a magical stat to reach for, imo.

Hopefully will be a great well.. please keep it open for several days as Metetron did.

TY for doing this, Skier_5.

[/ QUOTE ]

I kinda realize that and it's not exactly what I meant. I mean there are hsnl and msnl players with all stats. lags, tags, nits and many styles are profitable.

Stats like AF are often gonna be determined by action on previous streets or your gameplan on future streets. Like if I never 3bet preflop my flop AF is gonna be a lot higher than if i do because not only do I have more strong hands, but I can bluff raise with a higher frequency.

Though I suppose if I do something different and unique and have an AF out of whack because of it, I suppose that wouldn't be a bad way to find out about it. ie ultra high river AF or something.

[orange]

what is your favorite live poker experience? ie. huge pot v. a tv pro/etc.

your favorite movie?

[skier_5]

[ QUOTE ]
what is your favorite live poker experience? ie. huge pot v. a tv pro/etc.

your favorite movie?

[/ QUOTE ]

fav live experience would have to be my tourney score. the final table was televised, but that kinda sucked, but I had a big stack during most of the late stages of the tournament (until i got overflushed with 12 left for like 25% of the chips in play or something K hi vs nut) and its just great to push people around and apply pressure.

close second would have to be at TS in august where i ran sick hot at 10/20 uncapped and won like 13k in a few hours of 10/25 and the game wasnt sitting insane deep or anything.

favorite movie would probably have to be old school

[_dave_]

[ QUOTE ]

ie ultra high river AF or something.


[/ QUOTE ]

Now that is interesting, in light of the Absolute scandal I have been giving considerable thought to ultra-high river AF... basically perfect TOP play (or superuser cheating) generates an infinite river AF ... but then so does trusting your reads and going with them, maybe?

Is it a lack of faith in / accuracy of reads that leads to any hint of passivity once all the cards are out?

[markuisis]

any links to gamble4you's well? also, has durrrr had one?

[LiveNow]

any lightbulb moments?

[_dave_]

[ QUOTE ]

any links to gamble4you's well?


[/ QUOTE ]

It was in BBV

EDIT: here: http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showfl...ue#Post12907282

disappointingly short lived [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]

[ASPoker8]

how annoying was i when i was learning nl cash?

[skier_5]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

ie ultra high river AF or something.


[/ QUOTE ]

Now that is interesting, in light of the Absolute scandal I have been giving considerable thought to ultra-high river AF... basically perfect TOP play (or superuser cheating) generates an infinite river AF ... but then so does trusting your reads and going with them, maybe?

Is it a lack of faith in / accuracy of reads that leads to any hint of passivity once all the cards are out?

[/ QUOTE ]

well having an infinite river AF is pretty much impossible in reality ebcause, even though you are actually playing against a single hand only, you have to play against a range of hands and often you are calling even though you are behind some parts of their range and because its overall more profitable to call than to raise. Not to mention that pot odds dictate that you have to call when behind a range as well.

That's not really what I meant though, generally if you have a really high river AF if means that you have to play at least some of your good hands in a fashion that allows you to raise the river so you can balance your bluffs, which in general is fairly unusual.