![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Pacific there is always at least one 70/10 whale at the tables.
Average stats for for 6/max are prob 40/12 I would say |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Pacific is spot on, the horrible software keeps any serious player out and the large casino partner site keeps bringing in new fishes. I made a nice profit there playing NL50 but then left because the software made me puke.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
The question is why do none of the sites get an A or A+?
Because the BH system rates against the Party of old in terms of average pot sizes (around 3 years ago, which also counted uncalled bet in the pot sizes), so no current site can come close to this standard which I think was an A. Pacific/Boss have the worst players hands down, yet they get B and C+. Pokerstars has the best game selection, but also the most regulars by a mile, hence the games are really tight. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
pacific is loose yes, but the software is absolutely terrible, it glitches, it lags, it's hard to read, just [censored], so I left.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|