![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
as sad as it is, sklansky is right. I dont really see how you can argue with what he said in his post. its sick and disgusting and what not, but its true. [/ QUOTE ] exactly. It was pretty obvious that there would be an outrage and some backlash, but did people really think that Absolute would fold because of this? Someone cheated and Absolute did a crappy job of handing it. Its terrible, but its not the end of the poker world. People can call for a boycott, but its like voting for Ron Paul; feels like the right thing to do, but in the end, who cares? |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
who is Ron Paul?
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Guys he's just stating a simple EV equation.
If (expected win from juicier games at AP) - (expected win from where you play right now) > (whatever price tag you put on your moral repulsion to generating rake for the AP owners), then clearly it is +EV to switch to AP. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|