|
|
|
|
#1
11-11-2007, 05:58 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: IUPAC Nomenclature: SUCRALOSE
ty tom!! i was lookin particularly at the wikipedia picture for sucralose and they are missing a carbon...i was gettin really confused lol. The only thing im still somewhat confused w/ is the 4-deoxy, and the 1,6 dideoxy parts...
|
|
#2
11-11-2007, 07:07 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: IUPAC Nomenclature: SUCRALOSE
The deoxy is because the OHs that would be there in the sugar (galactose or fructose) aren't because they have been replaced by Cl. Deoxy: De - minus Oxy - Oxygen.
And yeah, the galactose ring is missing carbon 6 in the wikipedia structure, although the molecular model version appears correct at first glance.
|
|
#3
11-11-2007, 08:47 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: IUPAC Nomenclature: SUCRALOSE
Threads like these make me glad I underacheived and became a PE teacher and basketball coach.
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
