Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Poker Legislation

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-11-2007, 10:04 AM
Cactus Jack Cactus Jack is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Somewhere on the Strip
Posts: 1,423
Default Re: Mason... Sir,

If given a choice between TE and Bluffidiot, I'll guess I'll not be reading any more posts on the Legislation Forum. The 2+2 attack dog--Bluffidiot--has retaken the forum and made it his own. Disagree, and he'll hump your leg until you go away.

Too bad the powers-that-be chose such an unpleasant poster to be their representative.

I hope that someone will PM me when Bluffidiot has been banned again, so I may come back and read what might be important to me and others who really care about poker, and not a personal vendetta.

CJ--who's views represent the Democratic Party because he once voted for one of its candidates.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-11-2007, 10:58 AM
Steve565 Steve565 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 59
Default Re: Mason... Sir,


As a separate but related story.

I posted on Yahoo message board for maybe 6 or 7 years for one particular stock. There was a large following of daily posters.

Yahoo made some crazy changes which everyone was unhappy about. One week later, the entire group (I mean everyone) was posting on Investor Village, never to return to Yahoo.

This is the internet, there's (supposed to be) a real freedom here. And there are excellent training sites and forums all around. If you're unhappy with a particalur site, for whatever reason, gravitate elsewhere. I will.

Read this quick, I'm sure the thread will be locked or my post will be removed.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-11-2007, 05:24 PM
Mason Malmuth Mason Malmuth is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Nevada
Posts: 5,654
Default Re: Mason... Sir,

[ QUOTE ]
If given a choice between TE and Bluffidiot

[/ QUOTE ]

It's very important that the exchange on this board remains professional in manner. Just because you don't agree with Bluffthis's positions doesn't mean you are allowed to interject these kinds of comments into your posts.

MM
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-16-2007, 03:50 PM
Dustin D Dustin D is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 100
Default Re: Mason... Sir,

Mason you seem to have a great many strengths, but your social abilities could use some work. You come across as fairly unlikeable quite often.



Dustin Dirksen
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-16-2007, 06:49 PM
yahboohoo yahboohoo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 206
Default Re: Mason... Sir,

The Engineer has never struck me as one motivated by self-interests ever. He has spent a lot of time, thought and energy trying to help poker players.

Bluff_This is a petty troll who wastes everyone's time with trivial distractions from the big picture.

Mason could make more of an effort (in more ways than one).

2+2 threads like this are a complete turn off, and contribute ZERO to poker players' concerns. That this thread has over 60 posts and 1,500 views is an embarrassment. Think of all the wasted energy and attention this thread has consumed, then multiply it times every other worthless thread like it in the Legislative Forum (1 in 10? 1 in 20?).

Sad.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.