|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: plan? | |||
| flat-call |
   
|
2 | 3.13% |
| 4-bet to $1.15 |
  
|
43 | 67.19% |
| shove |
  
|
16 | 25.00% |
| BASTARD |
  
|
2 | 3.13% |
| I'M IN YER POLL PICKIN YER OPTIONS |
  
|
1 | 1.56% |
| Voters: 64. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
11-09-2007, 09:18 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: JC Tran controversy poll
No angle, you muck your cards, you lose. Noob to seasoned pro, if you feel the need to muck your hand while the pot is still live, you should be held accountable by losing your right to win the pot.
|
|
#3
11-09-2007, 09:22 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: JC Tran controversy poll
Well, in a tournament, for reasons you don't agree with, the rule is it's a live hand. Deal with it, or don't play tournaments.
|
|
#4
11-09-2007, 09:46 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: JC Tran controversy poll
I'm fully away what the rule is in donkaments. The point is, its ability to prevent collusion is NOT effective enough to warrant overlooking these types of scenarios, such as the JC Tran video. This situation happens more than you're aware of i think.....
|
|
#5
11-09-2007, 09:52 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: JC Tran controversy poll
[ QUOTE ]
I'm fully away what the rule is in donkaments. The point is, its ability to prevent collusion is NOT effective enough to warrant overlooking these types of scenarios, such as the JC Tran video. This situation happens more than you're aware of i think..... [/ QUOTE ] LOL, no it does not. Collusion happens more than something like this does. In fact, if they applied this cash rule to tournaments, chip dumping would no longer occur in bathrooms anymore.
|
|
#6
11-09-2007, 10:38 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: JC Tran controversy poll
[ QUOTE ]
I'm fully away what the rule is in donkaments. The point is, its ability to prevent collusion is NOT effective enough to warrant overlooking these types of scenarios, such as the JC Tran video. This situation happens more than you're aware of i think..... [/ QUOTE ] Name three other instances where this has happened, ever.
|
|
#7
11-09-2007, 09:25 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: JC Tran controversy poll
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I'm fully away what the rule is in donkaments. The point is, its ability to prevent collusion is NOT effective enough to warrant overlooking these types of scenarios, such as the JC Tran video. This situation happens more than you're aware of i think..... [/ QUOTE ] Name three other instances where this has happened, ever. [/ QUOTE ] I'm asking again. Name three instances.
|
|
#8
11-09-2007, 09:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: JC Tran controversy poll
JC Tran should've wont he hand, no question about it!!!
Look at the Card Player vid, he looks at his hand one more time and throws it to the dealer face-down.
|
|
#10
11-10-2007, 03:01 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: JC Tran controversy poll
[ QUOTE ]
JC Tran should've wont he hand, no question about it!!! Look at the Card Player vid, he looks at his hand one more time and throws it to the dealer face-down. [/ QUOTE ] Thats because he knows what the ruling is after making sure with the TD. All of these people saying JC Tran was complaining about the decision, either watch the video, or re-watch it, because Tran could not have been more calm about it. The point is, anyone in their right mind, including JC Tran and Chiau Giang, know that what happened is not right, correct ruling given the current donkament rules or not.
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
