Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > News, Views, and Gossip

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-08-2007, 01:47 PM
jackhigh jackhigh is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 195
Default Re: Absolutely heated about JC Tran situation at Foxwoods

1. Inconclusive that player was mucking hand.
2. Cards did not hit muck
3. All Ins require both cards to be exposed to prevent collusion

Conclusion:
1. Right decision bad outcome
2. Seen worse bad beats! (always put on me of course)
3. Tournaments are luckfests
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-08-2007, 01:50 PM
Nairb Nairb is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: KnoxVegas
Posts: 407
Default Re: Absolutely heated about JC Tran situation at Foxwoods

In the video does it matter that the guy that mucked his cards appeared to be paying off JC. It looked like he had slipped the chips over to JC and surrendering the hand.

Seems based on the rules like a good ruling but it appeared to me that there was no mistaking his intention to fold there.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-08-2007, 01:58 PM
0524432 0524432 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 461
Default Re: Absolutely heated about JC Tran situation at Foxwoods

[ QUOTE ]
In the video does it matter that the guy that mucked his cards appeared to be paying off JC. It looked like he had slipped the chips over to JC and surrendering the hand.

Seems based on the rules like a good ruling but it appeared to me that there was no mistaking his intention to fold there.

[/ QUOTE ]

Exactly, he drops a few chips from his stack in front of Tran's. Who does this? I don't know, complete fishcake obviously. Besides the point however....

NOBODY throws their hand away like he did, if they are attempting to stay involved in the hand. Let me ask you this.... If spewdonk shoved, as he did in this situation, but instead showed AK, and Tran had called with JJ on the 995 flop, do you HONESTLY think he would have thrown his hand away like that? No. He's a donk, if you don't want to let your hand read, rebuy.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-08-2007, 03:05 PM
CnC CnC is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 60
Default Re: Absolutely heated about JC Tran situation at Foxwoods

He got caught in a bluff and lost focus ... the ruling was right tho ... he was ALL IN at the flop. This is a good rule ... it protects possible collusion on the table.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-08-2007, 03:09 PM
optionsguy optionsguy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 105
Default Re: Absolutely heated about JC Tran situation at Foxwoods

[ QUOTE ]
He got caught in a bluff and lost focus ... the ruling was right tho ... he was ALL IN at the flop. This is a good rule ... it protects possible collusion on the table.

[/ QUOTE ]

This is kinda my point. If you didn't know either of the players could you not assume this is collusion? Maybe they could make the rule like once he throws his cards in they are shown and then mucked before the turn and river are put out.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-08-2007, 04:09 PM
johnnyrocket johnnyrocket is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: 8 tabling and raising all donk bets
Posts: 3,679
Default Re: Absolutely heated about JC Tran situation at Foxwoods

yea thats awful, this makes me sick they rule that the winning hand
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-08-2007, 01:59 PM
1tripz1 1tripz1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 270
Default Re: Absolutely heated about JC Tran situation at Foxwoods

not even that interesting tbh
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-08-2007, 01:53 PM
CSuave CSuave is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 12
Default Re: Absolutely heated about JC Tran situation at Foxwoods

The intent of the caller was to muck his hand.... it was not to flip them up... He threw them towards the dealer not trying to flip them up on the table. One of the cards actually exited what is consider the playing area of felt and went into the chip rack which is considered in many places to be off the table.
You are correct that both hands are to be shown during an all in where no more action can take place but if a player wishes to kill his hand that can be done so and then expose the hand. The callers intent was to fold. The dealer prevented it by turning the hand up. At no time is a dealer or other player to touch a live hand and turn it up, that is the responsibility of the player of the hand. The dealer could have instructed the player to turn over the hand but the dealer should not have turned it over without killing the hand first.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-08-2007, 07:21 PM
JDesab JDesab is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 184
Default Re: Absolutely heated about JC Tran situation at Foxwoods

[ QUOTE ]

You are correct that both hands are to be shown during an all in where no more action can take place but if a player wishes to kill his hand that can be done so and then expose the hand. The callers intent was to fold. The dealer prevented it by turning the hand up. At no time is a dealer or other player to touch a live hand and turn it up, that is the responsibility of the player of the hand. The dealer could have instructed the player to turn over the hand but the dealer should not have turned it over without killing the hand first.

[/ QUOTE ]

perhaps you should review the cardplayer.tv video. the tournament director said that the dealer did nothing wrong.

the player CAN NOT fold his hand in that all in situation. the hand will be played out. are you new to tournament rules?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-08-2007, 01:54 PM
0524432 0524432 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 461
Default Re: Absolutely heated about JC Tran situation at Foxwoods

[ QUOTE ]

2. Seen worse bad beats! (always put on me of course)


[/ QUOTE ]

Has nothing to do with it. This guy pushed his cards FACE DOWN towards the dealer after seeing JC Tran's hand. One of the cards flipped after hitting a pile of chips inadvertently. If people do not have the self control to let their cards read, and shove their cards towards the muck out of pure tiltspew, they should lose their privilege to win the pot.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.