Problem with your book

[master_hellmuth]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
See: gambler's fallacy.

[/ QUOTE ]

Have you looked into this yet???

[/ QUOTE ]

Its not the same thing as what I'm saying. I'm not saying that past results DEFINITIEVLY PREDICT future outcomes, I'm saying they make them MORE OR LESS LIKELY. I don't get whey people can't understand this.

Anyway, I don't want to insult the book, I've been reading more of it, and it seems good and I like it. Its just this one concept where I disagree.