Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Politics

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-28-2007, 04:26 PM
tomdemaine tomdemaine is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: buying up the roads around your house
Posts: 4,835
Default Re: A/C in Action: The AP Case

Risk of getting scammed playing online poker = X where x>0. Some people have tolerance for high levels of X you seem to have a slightly lower tolerance some people have no tolerance at all. What right do you have to impose you risk tolerance on others? If I want to play poker doing no research beforehand about widely publicized scams so be it. The time it takes to look stuff up isn't worth the extra risk to me. It is to you and that's great. What if (for a crazy example) some people thought that any amount of risk of being scammed online shouldn't be tolerated and tried to impose their risk levels onto you by banning online gaming?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-28-2007, 04:58 PM
Exsubmariner Exsubmariner is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Doing It Deeper
Posts: 2,510
Default Re: A/C in Action: The AP Case

[ QUOTE ]
What if (for a crazy example) some people thought that any amount of risk of being scammed online shouldn't be tolerated and tried to impose their risk levels onto you by banning online gaming?



[/ QUOTE ]

Well, first of all, I stopped playing online back around the time the whole Neteller thing happened. That was the end of the road for me.

About your question, that has already happened.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.