I just played some 25nl full ring on party

[FreakDaddy]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]


I never called you or anyone here a noob. The fact that twice you've said I've insulted you means you are reading something that isn't there, which is quite curious don't you think?


[/ QUOTE ]

from your last post:

[ QUOTE ]
I was hoping by posting the session that there would be disccussion about the hands, not a continued onslaught of newbies saying I'm stupid.

[/ QUOTE ]

I've leave it to others to decide who's right here.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'll take it that you're equating "newbie" with "noob", which is an insult to you.

"Newbie" to me means, someone who is new to the forum, which does not include you.

Interesting interpretation though.

[thirteen]

[ QUOTE ]
If they truely knew it was absurd, they really don't need to say anything. Just laugh at me and call me an idiot to themselves.
(Can't wait for the post that says that's what I was doing). [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

Hmmm, well you asked for it...

This is pretty much what I did. In reality I expected this post to be locked long before it even got to the level of bickering its become.

I have to say that each post you make seems to be even more absurd in nature.

You've claimed at least twice now that you think 100ptbb/100 is possible at NL 25 and if you really thought so, woudln't you play there regularly? My math could be wrong but isn't 100ptbb/100 equal to $50 per 100 hands. You'd have to make 12.5ptbb/100 to to make that much at NL $200 correct? And I can't imagine that 12+ ptbb/100 is sustainable at NL $200.

[neverforgetlol]

it's very sustainable at NL25, please shutup.

[TheBeloved]

Forgive the hijack but talking about posted hand histories did anyone get hold of TheWorstPlayers NL100 HH in which he illustrated a TAG style of play ?

[jmillerdls]

All I know is that its hard to tell who is a newbie when the person with all the posts keeps claiming that 100PTBB/100 is sustainable when no one has ever shown they can do 1/4 of that over any substantial hands...and by substantial, I mean significantly more than a 130 hand session.

[fishfather]

when you wrote:

but it was quite easy to know where I was, get people to play back at me when I had the goods, and mix up my game to utterly confuse them.

I looked forward to reading the hand histories. You did a decent job with one; I didn't see 2, except for 1 hand; and 3--well, no comment.

In any case give free reign to your ego. I'll wager you can't do 100ptbb/100 over a signficant # of hands (50,000) at 25nl full ring or 6 max.

[Isura]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

I'm curious about this item. You're main point is you are trying to induce them to bet at you. Wouldn't laying down to a reraise also do this? Wouldn't this encourage them to come over the top at you more?

[/ QUOTE ]

yes, but you want them to come over the top of you after the flop after they give you a chance to hit something with your random hand against their big one. You don't want them reraising you big preflop because it nukes your implied odds.....ideally what you want is the guy to get AA and try to trick you and just smoothcall, and then flop 2 pair or something against it.

If someone is playing real lag one of the good ways to hurt them is to reraise them big preflop with a pretty wide range and isolate their hand which is probably worse than yours.

[/ QUOTE ]

Good post. Phil Gordon talks about this in his book too, how his strategy against Spirit Rock is to reraise a lot preflop to exploit his equity advantage, and negate the amount of streets he has to play postflop against a great player.

[deaders]

This thread is ridiculous. Wow you ran hot playing a pretty standard game (with some donktastic, not LAG, plays thrown in) for ~100 hands and are now convinced that 25NL is beatable for 100ptBB/100. Thanks for your amazing contribution.

I seriously doubt there isnt a decent SSNL player here who hasnt had a hot session and won 4-5 buyins in an hour or two, it doesnt mean that they are God's gift to the game, its just running hot. Get over yourself.

[kyro]

My friend has been trying to convince me that this whole thread/post is a complete joke. I'm starting to agree with him.

Congratulations, OP. You fooled an entire forum. Pat yourself on the back.

[Pokertastic]

[ QUOTE ]
All I know is that its hard to tell who is a newbie when the person with all the posts keeps claiming that 100PTBB/100 is sustainable when no one has ever shown they can do 1/4 of that over any substantial hands...and by substantial, I mean significantly more than a 130 hand session.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think 25PTBB/100 is sustainable at 25nl 6max for an experienced player. From Feb 1st to now I'm running at 22PTBB/100 after 7231hands running 2 tables at a time. I'm far from the best player on these boards and I'm sure others would be far more successful if they dropped down and tried.

100PTBB/100 is another thing... I don't think that is possible at all. 2 tabling that's about 45min and there's no way you can stack someone every 25minutes to sustain that kind of winrate.