Steps on Stars

[jimg28]

[ QUOTE ]

With the current structure, more seats will be offered to the PCA.


That is the goal of steps. If they offered a 6-max winner take all, that's one thing, or a 9 max with 3 re-dos only and adjust the cost of rake to fit. But once you get to the final level, moving down to level 3 and 4 is absurd.

[/ QUOTE ]

If the goal of the steps was to qualify people they should only let people win once. Once you have won your seat you cant play in anymore steps. Convert all their remaining tickets to T$ or W$. Instead of letting the sit and go pros win multiple times and accumulate w$ from the low limit grinders who happen to make it to step 6.

[Bakes]

no step 6a plz, the more tables the better. party did this same crap too, 3 packages is good for everyone.

Now, if only you could keep Dario from softplaying innisst.

[Ontario_Tory]

Bryan - you're looking for feedback, so:

If you implement 6a as described, I'm gonna try 'em out. As a true low-limit donk, the 6a setup will allow me to take some shots with a chance of getting some $ at the end. I may end up with a PCA seat, but that's just gravy.

With the current step 6 setup, I'm not bothering to try, as I would consider myself a major-dog at the end, so even spending $7.50 would be big time -EV for me.

OT

[ClassicBob]

[ QUOTE ]
Bryan - you're looking for feedback, so:

If you implement 6a as described, I'm gonna try 'em out. As a true low-limit donk, the 6a setup will allow me to take some shots with a chance of getting some $ at the end. I may end up with a PCA seat, but that's just gravy.

With the current step 6 setup, I'm not bothering to try, as I would consider myself a major-dog at the end, so even spending $7.50 would be big time -EV for me.

OT

[/ QUOTE ]

That 7.50 has allowed me to rack up FPPs much quicker than I normally would.

Also, definitely bring in 6a.

[CharlieDontSurf]

[ QUOTE ]
Bryan - you're looking for feedback, so:

If you implement 6a as described, I'm gonna try 'em out. As a true low-limit donk, the 6a setup will allow me to take some shots with a chance of getting some $ at the end. I may end up with a PCA seat, but that's just gravy.

With the current step 6 setup, I'm not bothering to try, as I would consider myself a major-dog at the end, so even spending $7.50 would be big time -EV for me.

OT

[/ QUOTE ]

Same boat here...decided to wait to see if a 1 table like the one you guys are proposing would be created. now that I see it is almost a given...I'm gonna start multi playing the step 1s and work my way up from Level 1 to hopefully win a PCA seat and some $$ along the way.

Doubt I would have ever played them if the 18man Level 6 were all that were offered.

Tnxs for listening Stars

[TheJacob]

6 and 6(a) please.

[crashjr]

I'd really like to see protected steps, where buy-ins to steps four, five, and six must be made with a ticket won in a lower step. I also like the single table step 6 described above.