am i playing this incorrectly? it's cost me alot of money lately

[Unknown Soldier]

[ QUOTE ]
UTG dealt KsKc, i limp for $2...


[/ QUOTE ]

saw this and stopped reading. Your answer is yes you are playing incorrectly.

[thac]

Wow yeah, if you're that readable that he can ask you if you have KK or AA, you're doing it wrong.

[grando]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
UTG dealt KsKc, i limp for $2...


[/ QUOTE ]

saw this and stopped reading. Your answer is yes you are playing incorrectly.

[/ QUOTE ]

I limp-reraise AA/KK/QQ/AK all the time from EP in live play

[Unknown Soldier]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
UTG dealt KsKc, i limp for $2...


[/ QUOTE ]

saw this and stopped reading. Your answer is yes you are playing incorrectly.

[/ QUOTE ]

I limp-reraise AA/KK/QQ/AK all the time from EP in live play

[/ QUOTE ]


i hope you're levelling. lrr at a 200nl live gme is just soooooooo bad.

[grando]

with $100 effective stack it isn't

[sh58]

a)LRR with 50BB is fine.

b)raise 6BB, get 4 callers.

flop is 30BB. then you can bet call.

both are fine IMO. 1st probably less variance (you will only get 1 caller, not 4 probably)

[TheChad]

I personally like this play at 1/2nl. I don't use it all that often, but it does work.
If, however, there is a 5/10nl reg sitting, I raise a lot wider range than aa/kk/ak. For ex, I'll pick two or three SCs and a one-gapper to add to limp/calling in EP and raise with them from LP.
I think that most live 1/2NLers are not able to narrow someone that w/t to AA/KK PF so I wouldn't worry about it too much. Even if they are, having a 50BB stack all of the time won't phase them stacking off with JJ or AK. Most of the time, the regs in my 1/2NL game have 250BB+.