![]() |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Call or Fold? | |||
| Call |
|
5 | 10.64% |
| Fold |
|
42 | 89.36% |
| Voters: 47. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] can i get any thoughts on this? ![]() ![]() from 100nl - 600nl...with a little 5/10 - 50/100 hu...but most in the 100 -- 600nl range... [/ QUOTE ] Just curious, isen't 55% VPIP from SB slightly conservative? I do not play cash but in my HU SNG I have 67% from SB. [/ QUOTE ] I think so, basing off my play from memory. I think a big part of this though is who I am playing. At 100 and 200nl I played full stax indiscrimantely because most full stacks suck at either limit. At 400nl + however, specifically 600nl+ I'm playing a lot of short stax, which means i'm not opening as often with ATC...so I think that has brought my sb vpip down a bit. At 400nl I will play most of the full stax, excpet a few regs...and generally the regs dont sit with each other anyways...but at like 600 and 1k nl i usually like to pick off the 20-50bb stax (or anyone who buys in for less than 100bb and only sitting one table, usually a sign of a weak player)...as the game selection there does start to get much tougher (as far as finding sub-par 100bb stack players). I do know I have leaks and adjustments I want to make...I do too want to play more full stax at the higher limits...but it's honestly somewhat pointless to play other regs and try and fight over a few bb winning sesh (or avoiding just tilting off money) when you can play a few short stax and be guarenteed money more or less. any of this make sense, or no? |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|