Debate regarding bigger games at canterbury

[Milo]

100/200 against PokerBob, Schneids, BicycleKick, et al? No thanks.

Could they get a game going? Sure. Maybe not running all the time as the 30/60 does, but I'm sure they could get it running on weekends and maybe a few nights a week.

Are they interested? Doubtful. I don't think there is a huge pool of players who want to play higher, but won't play at CP because 30/60 is the highest. Sure, there are a few "elite" players from MN who play in LA to get into bigger games, but with 33 tables full on weekends already, putting their energy into getting the law changed so they can have one more table running some of the time (that will draw players away from another game) doesn't make sense. They would much rather use their legislative time/money to push for a "racino."

This is my opinion only, and it could be wildly inaccurate, but I doubt it.