Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Televised Poker

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-09-2007, 02:34 PM
FGators FGators is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,339
Default Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/8) (possible spoliers in thread to co

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Did I just see that? Mike Baxtor had a brain fart. WTF was that AI with KQo?

And Eli calling there? he and Sammy must be playing the same money.

West Coast viewer. LOL.

[/ QUOTE ]
The only way the play makes sense to me is that Baxter thought he had 10 outs, and thus had the odds to call. He actually did have 10 outs against Sammy. His blunder was that he forgot about the pre-flop raiser who had yet to act behind him (or maybe he thought Eli would not overcall without a monster). In any case, he was marginally correct to call if all parts fell into place, but idiotically wrong if they didn't.

[/ QUOTE ]

Don't forget also that Jamie Gold was in the pot as well, after Baxter. Though Gold looked uninterested he cannot be immediately put out of the hand because as we know he tries to be the biggest actor in poker.

Just a ridiculous, ridiculous play by Baxter...and yeah I don't know how Elezra called.

Pretty ridiculous shove by Farha too, though it was better than Baxter and Elezra's play.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-09-2007, 05:57 PM
BigSoonerFan BigSoonerFan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Augusta National
Posts: 1,937
Default Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/8) (possible spoliers in thread to co

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Did I just see that? Mike Baxtor had a brain fart. WTF was that AI with KQo?

And Eli calling there? he and Sammy must be playing the same money.

West Coast viewer. LOL.

[/ QUOTE ]
The only way the play makes sense to me is that Baxter thought he had 10 outs, and thus had the odds to call. He actually did have 10 outs against Sammy. His blunder was that he forgot about the pre-flop raiser who had yet to act behind him (or maybe he thought Eli would not overcall without a monster). In any case, he was marginally correct to call if all parts fell into place, but idiotically wrong if they didn't.

[/ QUOTE ]

Don't forget also that Jamie Gold was in the pot as well, after Baxter. Though Gold looked uninterested he cannot be immediately put out of the hand because as we know he tries to be the biggest actor in poker.

Just a ridiculous, ridiculous play by Baxter...and yeah I don't know how Elezra called.

Pretty ridiculous shove by Farha too, though it was better than Baxter and Elezra's play.

[/ QUOTE ]

Jamie wasn't just disinterested, he actually folded out of turn, and I don't think he got them back. He was not a factor in Baxter's decision. If Baxter had called Sammy with tw players behind him, it would have been even more idiotic.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-09-2007, 06:00 PM
brian4cards brian4cards is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 74
Default Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/8) (possible spoliers in thread to co

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Did I just see that? Mike Baxtor had a brain fart. WTF was that AI with KQo?

And Eli calling there? he and Sammy must be playing the same money.

West Coast viewer. LOL.

[/ QUOTE ]
The only way the play makes sense to me is that Baxter thought he had 10 outs, and thus had the odds to call. He actually did have 10 outs against Sammy. His blunder was that he forgot about the pre-flop raiser who had yet to act behind him (or maybe he thought Eli would not overcall without a monster). In any case, he was marginally correct to call if all parts fell into place, but idiotically wrong if they didn't.

[/ QUOTE ]

Don't forget also that Jamie Gold was in the pot as well, after Baxter. Though Gold looked uninterested he cannot be immediately put out of the hand because as we know he tries to be the biggest actor in poker.

Just a ridiculous, ridiculous play by Baxter...and yeah I don't know how Elezra called.

Pretty ridiculous shove by Farha too, though it was better than Baxter and Elezra's play.

[/ QUOTE ]

Gold wasn't in the pot. He folded out of turn before Baxter acted.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-09-2007, 08:02 PM
john voight john voight is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: SALAZARRRRRRRR
Posts: 2,653
Default Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/8) (possible spoliers in thread to co

FWIW I read on some poker blog (no idea, dont think it was famous) or something that posted spoilers like 2 months ago. It said that in one hand phil hellmuth went into the tank for close to 10 minutes before scooping up a big pot.

I'm guessing this may have been the hand.

Lol at you guys thinking they didnt edit it on TV and he was only thinking for 20 seconds.

I highly doubt Jamey would say anything if it was less than 5 minutes.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-09-2007, 08:03 PM
john voight john voight is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: SALAZARRRRRRRR
Posts: 2,653
Default Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/8) (possible spoliers in thread to co

I was so happy when Eli hit that Q...
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-09-2007, 08:04 PM
john voight john voight is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: SALAZARRRRRRRR
Posts: 2,653
Default Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/8) (possible spoliers in thread to co

for all you guys who dont have GSN, (torrents are illeaglz yo) look up mook on youtube and subscribe to him; hes been posting videos every tuesday for the last 2 seasons. Very solid work he has done.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-09-2007, 09:17 PM
Jazzy3113 Jazzy3113 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Mergers & Acquisitions
Posts: 1,022
Default Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/8) (possible spoliers in thread to co

pokertube is letting me down, i hope mook can help
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-09-2007, 11:26 PM
Silent A Silent A is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: out of the grid
Posts: 2,838
Default Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/8) (possible spoliers in thread to co

[ QUOTE ]
(torrents are illeaglz yo)

[/ QUOTE ]

That depends on where you are I think. And I fail to see how they are any less legal than a youtube vid.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.