|
|
|
|
#1
10-09-2007, 11:50 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: WSOP on ESPN thread (10/9 - ME Final Table)
[ QUOTE ]
Seat 1 - Raymond Rahme - 16.32 million [/ QUOTE ] I'm looking forward to some donktacular displays from this guy. Seriously, I have not seen one hand that demonstrates this guy is a good player. He strikes me as an oblivious calling station. The best example is the 88 hand vs. Ray Henson. You could call that a great call on the river. More likely, it was just a ridiculous play that miraculously turned out to be right. Seriously, what do you beat on an A-Q-7-7-9 board? Silliness. 
|
|
#2
10-09-2007, 04:38 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: WSOP on ESPN thread (10/9 - ME Final Table)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Seat 1 - Raymond Rahme - 16.32 million [/ QUOTE ] I'm looking forward to some donktacular displays from this guy. Seriously, I have not seen one hand that demonstrates this guy is a good player. He strikes me as an oblivious calling station. The best example is the 88 hand vs. Ray Henson. You could call that a great call on the river. More likely, it was just a ridiculous play that miraculously turned out to be right. Seriously, what do you beat on an A-Q-7-7-9 board? Silliness. [/ QUOTE ] It gets WAY worse. The guy is clueless.
|
|
#4
10-09-2007, 07:42 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: WSOP on ESPN thread (10/9 - ME Final Table)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] It gets WAY worse. [/ QUOTE ] Really? I can't wait. [/ QUOTE ] Oh God, his bustout hand is *hilarious*
|
|
#5
10-09-2007, 07:46 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: WSOP on ESPN thread (10/9 - ME Final Table)
I predict that Lee Childs will be driven to the edge of madness in about 20 minutes resulting in an end of life.
|
|
#6
10-09-2007, 07:58 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: WSOP on ESPN thread (10/9 - ME Final Table)
[ QUOTE ]
I predict that Lee Childs will be driven to the edge of madness in about 20 minutes resulting in an end of life. [/ QUOTE ] I seriously cannot wait to see what Yang's hole cards are on that hand. I'm still thinking AKcc. He says JJ. I don't think a man of God would lie here.
|
|
#7
10-10-2007, 12:15 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: WSOP on ESPN thread (10/9 - ME Final Table)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] It gets WAY worse. [/ QUOTE ] Really? I can't wait. [/ QUOTE ] Oh God, his bustout hand is *hilarious* [/ QUOTE ] Can ANYONE explain how a rational player could take this blind push approach? is there ANY possible gain from doing this, rather than pushing preflop? All I could think is that Kahn was surprised that he wasn't RR preflop, and somehow thought "I have a big hand" was a reverse-tell.
|
|
#8
10-11-2007, 02:09 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: WSOP on ESPN thread (10/9 - ME Final Table)
[ QUOTE ]
Can ANYONE explain how a rational player could take this blind push approach? [/ QUOTE ] since khan was going to fold for 3.5m more after putting 6m in
|
|
#9
10-11-2007, 02:43 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: WSOP on ESPN thread (10/9 - ME Final Table)
I had a separate tab open with the PokerNews live coverage of the Final Tables, so I thought I'd compare the hands shown on ESPN with the actual hands.
1. Hand 6 2. Hand 9 3. Hand 14 4. Hand 15 5. Hand 18 6. Hand 21 7. Hand 28 8. Hand 40 9. Hand 42 10. Hand 48 11. Hand 50 12. Hand 55 13. Hand 56 Episode 2 14. Hand 58 15. Hand 60 16. Hand 78 17. Hand 92 18. Hand 95 19. Hand 108 20. Hand 127 21. Hand 129 22. Hand 149 23. Hand 167 24. Hand 169 25. Hand 205 During the last hand Lon said that Lam was "putting the pressure on early," referring to the earliness of the heads-up portion. Actually, it was the 36th heads up hand. 4 handed play lasted a long time, which is why there were such huge gaps in hands.
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
