![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
In a 9 man sng, you have 4 posibilities. You can finish down one buy-in, up .65 buy-ins, up 1.475 buy-ins or up 3.125 buy-ins. If your long term result is to be +.1 buy-ins per game (a 10% roi) it should be clear why any given set of games has a very low chance of converging to the long term results, this is why there is so much more variance in SNGs. [/ QUOTE ] No this is why there is LESS variance in SNGs. Your actual results never stray too far from your expectation. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Is it possible that table selection makes more money on avg in cash than sngs? Finding juicy tables and staying til they go bad, picking up on the moods/tendencies of the players at each table, using very detailed datamined stats. These are all skills you can use in cash and I think they curb some of the swings.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Table selection affects your winrate. In SNGs this doesn't change your winrate as much because your winnings are still capped.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|