Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Tournament Poker > High Stakes MTT

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-02-2007, 05:55 PM
Kuztah Kuztah is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 8
Default Re: Hand from Borgata WPT

Theres one thing that troubles me, im pretty sure he would make a continuation bet on the flop with an ace here unless it was a monster than maybe he would decide to slowplay it. So basicly my guess is that hands that check the flop after he bet into a utg limper are hands that are disgusted by the flop or hands that hit hard (2 pair or sets). Once u bet the turn, and he calls i relaly dont think he could make this call with a hand like qq or jj with 2 mroe players in the hand.

For that reason, im tending to believe he has a monster.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-02-2007, 06:15 PM
king_of_drafts king_of_drafts is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: studying
Posts: 2,661
Default Re: Hand from Borgata WPT

Ansky and AJ gave me good lols in this thread, but if I don't get anything else out of it I am going to be really disappointed after all the hype ZJ is building
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-02-2007, 06:18 PM
ZeeJustin ZeeJustin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,381
Default We have a winner!

[ QUOTE ]
Theres one thing that troubles me, im pretty sure he would make a continuation bet on the flop with an ace here unless it was a monster than maybe he would decide to slowplay it. So basicly my guess is that hands that check the flop after he bet into a utg limper are hands that are disgusted by the flop or hands that hit hard (2 pair or sets). Once u bet the turn, and he calls i relaly dont think he could make this call with a hand like qq or jj with 2 mroe players in the hand.

For that reason, im tending to believe he has a monster.

[/ QUOTE ]

VNH Kuztah.

There are two possibilities here. 1) he meant to raise. 2) he didn't.

Many people have said 1 makes sense. It obviously does. AA would be by far the most likely hand for this line, with KK in a close second. AK and TT are also possible, but both are significantly less likely than AA or KK. If this is the case, we have to fold.

So now we must examine option #2. He meant to call.

There are really no hands that make sense with this line. If he had a suited connector, or some other unlikely bluff preflop, this is the PERFECT flop to bet. He HAS to bluff at this flop if he misses, and is certainly not dumb enough to make that huge raise preflop and not c-bet on this flop.

It is possible that he just meant to call again with the hands from #1 - AA, KK, AK, TT, but we still have a clear fold against that range, especially given that it's weighted more towards AA and KK.

So if he meant to call, what are we hoping he has. KQ? I suppose that's possible, but he would most likely c-bet the flop, and might not call the turn, but more importantly, he's not likely to 6x it preflop. There are a couple of other hands like this, but they are all really unlikely to fit the line he took.

So it clearly makes sense that this could be an angle shoot.

But if he raises big preflop, and then checks the flop, the turn call really doesn't make much sense at all, unless he is REALLY slowplaying something, in which case we still should be folding.

This is a clear fold IMO.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-02-2007, 10:55 PM
DLizzle DLizzle is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,387
Default Re: We have a winner!

[ QUOTE ]


There are really no hands that make sense with this line. If he had a suited connector, or some other unlikely bluff preflop, this is the PERFECT flop to bet. He HAS to bluff at this flop if he misses, and is certainly not dumb enough to make that huge raise preflop and not c-bet on this flop.



[/ QUOTE ]

with all of your live tournament experience I don't know how you can give this guy this much credit. Your conclusion (in how you should play the hand) is fine but using this to reach it is pretty optimistic imo. i don't agree that this evidence concludes that he was angling.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:11 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.